2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-27181-6_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct, Merge, Solve and Adapt Applied to a Bus Driver Scheduling Problem with Complex Break Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows the objective function values for LNS, ALNS, CMSA (Rosati et al 2023) (same time budget) and BP (Kletzander, Musliu, and Van Hentenryck 2021). For each size there are 5 instances, each value in the table is the average of the 5 results per size due to space limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 shows the objective function values for LNS, ALNS, CMSA (Rosati et al 2023) (same time budget) and BP (Kletzander, Musliu, and Van Hentenryck 2021). For each size there are 5 instances, each value in the table is the average of the 5 results per size due to space limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instances up to size 90, BP (Kletzander, Musliu, and Van Hentenryck 2021) is the best algorithm. For larger instances, we used the values from CMSA (Rosati et al 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations