1984
DOI: 10.1086/268840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct Validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A Structural Modeling Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
233
2
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
233
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is surprising because it is not in concordance with the satisficing theory and not with empirical results found with adults (Andrews, 1984;Knäuper et al, 1997) and children (Benson & Hocevar, 1985;Marsh, 1986). That this result does not appear in our study can be the result of the definition of our dependent variable as stability over time.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is surprising because it is not in concordance with the satisficing theory and not with empirical results found with adults (Andrews, 1984;Knäuper et al, 1997) and children (Benson & Hocevar, 1985;Marsh, 1986). That this result does not appear in our study can be the result of the definition of our dependent variable as stability over time.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…The same contradiction might apply for the number of response options offered. In research with adults there is increasing evidence, and even consensus, that data quality improves as the number of response categories increases (Andrews, 1984;Krosnick & Fabrigar, 1997;Rodgers et al, 1989;Rodgers et al, 1988). However, the more options offered, the more burden is placed on verbal memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does of course not imply that the 11-point scale is the optimal response format for measuring attitudes under all circumstances. Rather, the appropriateness of a survey measure is a function of characteristics of the concept under study, such as domain and complexity, characteristics of respondents, such as their familiarity with the concept, and characteristics of the interview setting, such as mode of data collection (e.g., Andrews 1984;Alwin and Krosnick 1991;Scherpenzeel and Saris 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the logic of the multitrait-multimethod approach (Campbell & Fiske, 1959), they proposed that multiple strength-related attitude attributes should be assessed using several different types of rating scales. The attributes can then be represented as latent variables (gauged by multiple indicators), and method factors can be included in the model to account for certainty to load on a single factor for one attitude object and to load on different factors for a second object.10 covariation between the measures that is due to a common method of measurement (e.g., Alwin & Krosnick, 1985;Andrews, 1984;Green & Citrin, 1994;Green, Goldman, & Salovey, 1993;Jarvis & Petty, 1996). The use of multiple indicators also permits disattenuation of correlations between latent constructs to correct for the impact of random measurement error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%