2016
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1417a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct Validity and Reliability Measures of Scores from the Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Discontentment (STPD) Scale

Abstract: The Science Teachers' Pedagogical Discontentment (STPD) scale has formerly been developed in the United States and used since 2006. Based on the perceptions of selected teachers, the scale is deeply rooted in the cultural and national standards. Given these limitations, the measurement integrity of its scores has not yet been conclusively established internationally, such as in the Saudi Arabia context. The items of the scale are slightly tailored to make the instrument suitable in the specific context, such a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content validation process in this research was carried out by seven expert validators experienced in mathematics education and measurement. Content validation helps evaluate expert assessments of the instruments being developed (Aktas & Tabak, 2018;Amalina & Vidákovich, 2022;Kahveci et al, 2016). The findings regarding content validation align with research results that show that quantitative analysis of data through expert assessment helps reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the instrument.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The content validation process in this research was carried out by seven expert validators experienced in mathematics education and measurement. Content validation helps evaluate expert assessments of the instruments being developed (Aktas & Tabak, 2018;Amalina & Vidákovich, 2022;Kahveci et al, 2016). The findings regarding content validation align with research results that show that quantitative analysis of data through expert assessment helps reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the instrument.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Most importantly, it should be highlighted that the test is not completely reliable, so r = 1.00 is an impossible score to achieve. In all cases, the reliability coefficient is 13 Journal homepage: https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi RIASEC Holland's reliability and validity on personality of ... displayed as a decimal, and when it is larger, the test scores are considered more reliable and consistent (Moafian et al 2019;Kahveci et al 2016). Validity is the second most important element when testing and making a decision to use an assessment tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%