Context: Large-scale baseline cognitive assessment for individuals at risk for concussion is a common part of the protocol for concussion-surveillance programs, particularly in sports. Baseline cognitive testing is also being conducted in US military service members before deployment. Recently, the incremental validity of large-scale baseline cognitive assessment has been questioned.Objective: To examine the added value of baseline cognitive testing in computer-based neuropsychological assessment by comparing 2 methods of classifying atypical performance in a presumed healthy sample.Design: Cross-sectional study. Main Outcome Measure(s): Rates of atypical performance in this healthy, active-duty sample were determined first by comparing postdeployment scores with a military normative database and then with each individual's personal baseline performance using a reliable change index.Results: Overall rates of atypical performance were comparable across these 2 methods. However, these methods were highly discordant in terms of which individuals were classified as atypical. When norm-referenced methods were used, 2.6% of individuals classified as normal actually demonstrated declines from baseline. Further, 65.7% of individuals classified as atypical using norm-referenced scores showed no change from baseline (ie, potential false-positive findings).Conclusions: Knowing an individual's baseline performance is important for minimizing potential false-positive errors and reducing the risks and stresses of misdiagnosis.Key Words: Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics, computerized neuropsychological testing, concussions, mild traumatic brain injuries, military athletes
Key PointsWhen service members' predeployment and postdeployment performances on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics test were compared using norm-referenced scores and their personal baselines, the absolute rates of atypical performance were similar. However, for those individuals whose performance was classified as atypical, a high degree of discordance was noted between the methods. Using norms alone resulted in a high level of false-positive errors. Mistakenly classifying an individual as cognitively impaired should be avoided whenever possible because it can lead to overuse of medical resources and undue emotional stress. C omputer-based cognitive testing is fast becoming standard practice in the assessment and management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in sports and military concussion-management programs. Recommended sport-concussion protocols typically include baseline assessment of cognitive performance for individuals at high risk for concussion, against which postconcussion performance is compared.