2001
DOI: 10.1076/clin.15.4.498.1882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct Validity of Selected Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) Battery Measures

Abstract: The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) is a computerized library of tests designed to assess neurocognitive functioning across administrations (Kane & Reeves, 1997). This study was designed to examine neuropsychological constructs measured by selected ANAM measures and to compare them with traditional measures putatively assessing similar domains. The sample consisted of 191 outpatients with suspected neurocognitive dysfunction. Correlations and regressions indicated significant relationshi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ANAM was designed to be a brief, repeatable, and automated cognitive measure, allowing longitudinal assessment in a time-and cost-efficient manner. The ANAM battery is constructed of a variety of subtests assessing simple and complex reaction time, which have been shown to measure underlying cognitive domains similar to traditional neuropsychological measures (e.g., processing speed, short-term memory, working memory, and resistance to interference; Bleiberg, Kane, Reeves, Garmoe, & Halpern, 2000;Kabat, Kane, Jefferson, & DiPino, 2000Wilken et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANAM was designed to be a brief, repeatable, and automated cognitive measure, allowing longitudinal assessment in a time-and cost-efficient manner. The ANAM battery is constructed of a variety of subtests assessing simple and complex reaction time, which have been shown to measure underlying cognitive domains similar to traditional neuropsychological measures (e.g., processing speed, short-term memory, working memory, and resistance to interference; Bleiberg, Kane, Reeves, Garmoe, & Halpern, 2000;Kabat, Kane, Jefferson, & DiPino, 2000Wilken et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has good construct validity with traditional tests of attention, processing speed, and working memory. 6,7 Test-retest reliability for the individual tests varies between 0.4 and 0.8, with tests requiring higher cognitive processing showing better reliability and simple reaction time showing lower reliability, most likely due to the restricted response range. For this analysis, we used an ANAM composite score, which has been shown to have test-retest reliability coefficients ranging from 0.62 to 0.74.…”
Section: Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Match to Sample is significantly correlated (construct validity) with Digit Span backward, which is one of the most commonly used measures of working memory (Kabat et al, 2001). Using fifty-six participants from the larger study, test-retest stability coefficient was determined.…”
Section: Matching To Sample Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, computerized assessment tools are used in conjunction with traditional neuropsychological assessment tasks to complement weaknesses of traditional assessments. For example, computerized tests such as the Spaceflight Cognitive Assessment Tools battery (S-CAT; Reeves et al, 1992) allow recording of reaction times, accuracy, and performance efficiency (Kabat, Kane, Jefferson, & DiPino, 2001). …”
Section: Neurocognitive Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%