2020
DOI: 10.1111/jar.12789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct validity of the Actiwatch‐2 for assessing movement in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities

Abstract: These movement activities require a special approach regarding the attitude towards people with PIMD, because of their limitations in cognitive-and motor functioning (Nakken & Vlaskamp, 2007). People with PIMD are fully wheelchair dependent or require personal assistance to mobilize and change body position (Nakken & Vlaskamp, 2007). Technical devices and extensive support are needed to accommodate people with PIMD and supporting even very small movements of the limbs and postural changes of people with PIMD. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the content of motor activities, specific outcomes can be logically reasoned and checked based on staff reports and measurable results from instruments. In future studies, instruments such as diaries and accelerometers can be used to evaluate the motor activity of each individual with PIMD before and after implementation [39]. Moreover, instruments related to the goals set can be used to prove the findings based on staff reports.…”
Section: Theoretical Reflection and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the content of motor activities, specific outcomes can be logically reasoned and checked based on staff reports and measurable results from instruments. In future studies, instruments such as diaries and accelerometers can be used to evaluate the motor activity of each individual with PIMD before and after implementation [39]. Moreover, instruments related to the goals set can be used to prove the findings based on staff reports.…”
Section: Theoretical Reflection and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded (i) pregnant patients, (ii) those with cognitive impairment/intellectual disability severe enough to preclude self-report or self-consent, and (iii) those with significant mobility limitations (e.g., hemiparesis, quadriparesis). Subjects were instructed to wear the rugged, widely popular [46][47][48][49][50][51] and FDA-approved Actiwatch-2 device (Phillips Respironics) continuously for at least 10 days on their nondominant wrist ("through sleep and showers"), and asked to complete a printed handout of psychometric surveys (QIDS-SR, ESS, AEP, PHQ-SADS [which includes the PHQ15-somatic, GAD7-anxiety and PHQ9-depression]). A prepaid envelope was provided to return study materials.…”
Section: Participants and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcome measurements of the preliminary results are the level of physical activity and the food intake of people with moderate to profound levels of ID (n ¼ 24). Physical activity will be measured with the Actigraph (Chow et al, 2016;Nordstrm et al, 2013) for walking respondents and the Actiwatch (Van Alphen et al, 2020) for nonwalking respondents. Additionally, DSPs will record the planned movement activities during the measurements of physical activity.…”
Section: Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%