1979
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.47.6.1090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct validity of the MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale.

Abstract: This research further establishes the construct validity of the MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale (MAC) by determining-the personality dimensions assessed by the scale. Subjects were 161 male and 228 female psychiatric patients divided by sex into alcoholic, antisocial psychiatric, and general psychiatric groups. To investigate the sensitivity of the MAC to antisociality, analyses of variance of MAC scores were computed for the three patient groups for each sex. To investigate personality dimensions and self-descript… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAC scale continues to show considerable promise as a measure of potential alcohol and drug abuse problems (Ward & Jackson, 1991;Wolf, Schubert, Patterqon, & Grande, 1991). For a discussion of the effectiveness of the MAC scale for detecting addiction problems, see Schwartz and Graham (1979) and Sher and McCrady (1984).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAC scale continues to show considerable promise as a measure of potential alcohol and drug abuse problems (Ward & Jackson, 1991;Wolf, Schubert, Patterqon, & Grande, 1991). For a discussion of the effectiveness of the MAC scale for detecting addiction problems, see Schwartz and Graham (1979) and Sher and McCrady (1984).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A questionnaire was composed consisting of the 29 items that loaded greater than or equal to .400 on the six primary factors that Schwartz and Graham (1979) extracted from the MacAndrew scale: Cognitive Impairment, Social Maladjustment, Interpersonal Competence, Risk Taking, Extroversion and Exhibitionism, and Moral Indignation. Also included were 11 items from the Compulsiveness Inventory, a self-report instrument derived from the Leyton Obsessional Scale (Cooper, 1970) and consisting of three subscales: Indecision and Double-checking, Order and Regularity, and Detail and Perfectionism (Kagan & Squires, 1985b).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such analysis (Schwartz & Graham, 1979) revealed six primary dimensions. The present study compared mean scores obtained by populations addicted to diverse substances or activities on each of these six dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rathus, Fox, & Ortins, 1980). Schwartz and Graham (1979) examined the construct validity of this scale in 161 male and 228 female psychiatric patients.…”
Section: Substance Abusementioning
confidence: 99%