2014
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construct validity of the ovine model in endoscopic sinus surgery training

Abstract: This study describes an alternative model for ESS training and assessment. It is also the first to demonstrate construct validity of the sheep-head model for ESS training.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, validation of the lamb’s head for surgical training is recent, and was established in a study by measuring the performance of different groups (medical students, residents with varying levels of expertise, and experienced surgeons) in a single dissection [12]. These findings validated the model for training purposes by proving that more experienced professionals performed better than beginners and students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, validation of the lamb’s head for surgical training is recent, and was established in a study by measuring the performance of different groups (medical students, residents with varying levels of expertise, and experienced surgeons) in a single dissection [12]. These findings validated the model for training purposes by proving that more experienced professionals performed better than beginners and students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their validation of this model, Awad et al did not measure individual learning because their sample was composed of distinct groups with very different levels of knowledge, and participants practiced only once on the model [12]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variety of different simulation techniques has been adopted, including the use of cadaveric dissection, high‐fidelity animal models, virtual‐reality simulators, and synthetic models, with all simulation methods demonstrating significant improvement in the surgical learning curve . The use of animal models in ear, nose, and throat simulation is widely established in rhinology, facial plastics, and laryngology, due to their low cost and high fidelity, as demonstrated in face and content validity studies . These techniques adopted in other subspecialties could be applied to advanced airway surgery to generate a suitable model for LTR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] The use of animal models in ear, nose, and throat simulation is widely established in rhinology, facial plastics, and laryngology, due to their low cost and high fidelity, as demonstrated in face and content validity studies. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] These techniques adopted in other subspecialties could be applied to advanced airway surgery to generate a suitable model for LTR. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to identify the suitability of different commercially available animal models used to simulate laryngotracheal reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%