2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-016-0236-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructible sheaves on nilpotent cones in rather good characteristic

Abstract: We study some aspects of modular generalized Springer theory for a complex reductive group $G$ with coefficients in a field $\mathbb k$ under the assumption that the characteristic $\ell$ of $\mathbb k$ is rather good for $G$, i.e., $\ell$ is good and does not divide the order of the component group of the centre of $G$. We prove a comparison theorem relating the characteristic-$\ell$ generalized Springer correspondence to the characteristic-$0$ version. We also consider Mautner's characteristic-$\ell$ `cleann… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the functors [AHR,Proposition 4.7] and [AM,Proposition 3.1], these functors restrict to exact functors…”
Section: General Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consider the functors [AHR,Proposition 4.7] and [AM,Proposition 3.1], these functors restrict to exact functors…”
Section: General Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Here γ G P is the left adjoint to the forgetful functor For , and it also restricts to an exact functor (see [AM,Proposition 3…”
Section: General Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By [AJHR,Lemma 2.1], a prime is rather good if and only if l does not divide |A G (x)| for any x ∈ N G . The following is a part of a series of (unpublished) conjectures by C. Mautner.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is equivalent to requiring G to be standard in the sense of [14, §4]. It follows from [8,Theorem 1.8] and [3,Lemma 2.1] that when p is pretty good for G, it does not divide the order of G x /(G x ) • ∼ = G x red /(G x red ) • for any nilpotent element x. As an immediate consequence of Theorem 1.1 and Lemma 2.2 below, we have the following result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%