2017
DOI: 10.1177/0959353516678010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing abortion as a social problem: “Sex selection” and the British abortion debate

Abstract: Between February 2012 and March 2015, the claim that sex selection abortion was taking place in Britain and that action needed to be taken to stop it dominated debate in Britain about abortion. Situating an analysis in sociological and social psychological approaches to the construction of social problems, particularly those considering “feminised” re-framings of anti-abortion arguments, this paper presents an account of this debate. Based on analysis of media coverage, Parliamentary debate and official docume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abortion, however, remains politically controversial and subject to regular attempts by those opposed to abortion to introduce a more limiting framework or restrict particular types of abortion (Hoggart, 2003; Lee, 2013). Most recently, these have included attempts to introduce mandatory abortion counselling and proposals to change the law to prevent sex-selective abortions (Lee, 2017). These challenges to current abortion provision, alongside the frequently expressed assumption that abortion is inherently undesirable, have contributed to what has been characterised as “abortion negativity” (Lee, Clements, Ingham, & Stone, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abortion, however, remains politically controversial and subject to regular attempts by those opposed to abortion to introduce a more limiting framework or restrict particular types of abortion (Hoggart, 2003; Lee, 2013). Most recently, these have included attempts to introduce mandatory abortion counselling and proposals to change the law to prevent sex-selective abortions (Lee, 2017). These challenges to current abortion provision, alongside the frequently expressed assumption that abortion is inherently undesirable, have contributed to what has been characterised as “abortion negativity” (Lee, Clements, Ingham, & Stone, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this was not seen as affirming women's autonomy within medical decision-making, instead, the debates positioned this as acting to the detriment of women. The framing of this argument focused on the risks to women, positioning them as potential victims and aligned doctors with those who were positioned as coercing women (Lee, 2017). Identifiable victims who are at risk of harm are an important component of moral regulation campaigns.…”
Section: Abortion Law and Reform Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She suggests that the 'abortion industry' is 'knee-deep (…) in unethical, unsafe and unprofessional practice' (HC 13/03/2017 Vol 623 C30). The use of the word 'industry' and emphasis on 'private abortion providers' (HC 13/03/2017 Vol 623 C30) is clearly meant to signal a profit-driven practice in which care is compromised and is part of the vilification and stigmatisation of healthcare professionals involved in abortion (Lee, 2003(Lee, , 2017McGuinness, 2015). As Lee (2003) showed, the notion of an 'abortion industry' was developed in the US, but has very little relevance in Britain where almost all abortions are state funded, even when carried out in private or charitable abortion clinics.…”
Section: Moral Regulation and Risk Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Arizona, USA sex-selective and race-selective abortion is prohibited 20. The issue of promulgation of a law on sex-selective abortion is still unresolved in the UK 21. In 2005, sex-selective abortion was made illegal in China 22…”
Section: Global Health Problem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%