“…At 298 K and 0.4 mbar, the CO 2 uptake of NJU-Bai53 (2.74 wt %/0.64 mmol g –1 ) is improved about 50 times compared with the corresponding value of NJU-Bai52 (0.057 wt %/0.013 mmol g –1 ), which enables NJU-Bai53 to capture CO 2 directly from air. The CO 2 uptake of NJU-Bai53 at 298 K and 0.4 mbar is even superior to those of many MOFs, such as mmen-CuBTTri (0.22 wt %), SIFSIX-2-Cu-i (0.30 wt %), MOF-Mg-74 (0.39 wt %), SIFSIX-3-Zn (0.57 wt %) and NJU-Bai51 (0.56 wt %), but still lower than those of SIFSIX-3-Cu (5.17 wt %), mmen-Mg 2 (dobpdc) (8.09 wt %), and en-Mg 2 (dobpdc) (11.07 wt %) (Table S6). Furthermore, at 298 K and 0.15 bar, it exhibits a substantially higher uptake (7.67 wt %/1.89 mmol g –1 ) compared to NJU-Bai52 (5.75 wt %/1.39 mmol g –1 ), which are also comparable to those of famous MOFs, such as Zn-MOF-74 (7.60 wt %), NJU-Bai7 (7.42 wt %), Cu-TDPAT (7.41 wt %), NJU-Bai35 (7.20 wt %), CuTATB-60 (5.8 wt %), and ZIF-78 (3.32 wt %).…”