2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing and Forgetting Temporal Context in the Human Cerebral Cortex

Abstract: Constructing and Forgetting Temporal Context in the Human Cerebral Cortex Highlights d Distinct cortical responses when the same stimulus is preceded by different contexts d Responses align as common input continues: sensory cortex, then higher-order cortex d Cortical regions maintain a distributed and hierarchical representation of context d Distributed cortical memory is gated and prior context can be flexibly forgotten

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
73
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
6
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesized that, within individual A/B segments, high-level cortical regions would integrate information over time (i.e., they would show process memory) to build up a representation of the ongoing situation. In keeping with event segmentation theory (Zacks & Swallow, 2007;Zacks et al, 2001), we further hypothesized that storyline switches would result in "flushing out" of the previous storyline's representation in high-level cortical regions (see also Chien & Honey, 2020;DuBrow, Rouhani, Niv, & Norman, 2017;Ezzyat & Davachi, 2011), making it possible for that region to start representing the features of the other storyline. We also hypothesized that episodic memory would play a key role in reinstating existing storyline representations when the narrative returned to those storylines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We hypothesized that, within individual A/B segments, high-level cortical regions would integrate information over time (i.e., they would show process memory) to build up a representation of the ongoing situation. In keeping with event segmentation theory (Zacks & Swallow, 2007;Zacks et al, 2001), we further hypothesized that storyline switches would result in "flushing out" of the previous storyline's representation in high-level cortical regions (see also Chien & Honey, 2020;DuBrow, Rouhani, Niv, & Norman, 2017;Ezzyat & Davachi, 2011), making it possible for that region to start representing the features of the other storyline. We also hypothesized that episodic memory would play a key role in reinstating existing storyline representations when the narrative returned to those storylines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The primary functional consequence of this hierarchy of timescales is thought to be a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows: time windows in which a newly arriving stimulus will modify processing of previously presented (i.e. contextual) information ( Hasson et al, 2008 ; Honey et al, 2012 ; Baldassano et al, 2017 ; Huntenburg et al, 2018 ; Chaudhuri et al, 2015 ; Chien and Honey, 2020 ). Thus, areas at the bottom of the hierarchy preferentially respond to immediate changes in the sensory environment, while responses in areas at the top of the hierarchy are modulated by prior context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects who receive contextualizing background information show more strongly correlated neural responses in DMN in response to ambiguous narratives than subjects lacking this information (van Kesteren et al, 2010;Ames et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015;Oren et al, 2017). Similarly, subjects who are biased by context to interpret the stimulus in same way have more similar DMN responses with each other than with subjects who are biased towards a different interpretation (Yeshurun et al, 2017;Chien and Honey, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%