2004
DOI: 10.1177/1350507604048268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing Contributions to Organizational Learning

Abstract: This special issue of Management Learning provides the opportunity to reflect on the contribution over the past 30 years of Chris Argyris to the field of organizational learning and on some implications for future research. In order to do this we will reconsider his work against the context of other research that has been done over this period. This special issue therefore contains two items generated by Argyris himself: a commentary piece on the papers that are included here and an interview. The interview is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many prior studies on organizational unlearning have assumed that the term unlearning refers to a process of clearing out old routines and beliefs that no longer meet current challenges (Cegarra-Navarro, Eldridge, & Wensley, 2014;Tsang & Zahra, 2008). The idea behind unlearning is that the inability to dispose of outdated knowledge may become a major hindrance to learning or innovation (Easterby-Smith et al, 2004;Fernandez et al, 2012). That is, discarding obsolete knowledge is critical for gaining new knowledge; thus, the inefficiency with which many organizations promote unlearning is evidence of a crucial weakness (Hedberg, 1981).…”
Section: Unlearningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many prior studies on organizational unlearning have assumed that the term unlearning refers to a process of clearing out old routines and beliefs that no longer meet current challenges (Cegarra-Navarro, Eldridge, & Wensley, 2014;Tsang & Zahra, 2008). The idea behind unlearning is that the inability to dispose of outdated knowledge may become a major hindrance to learning or innovation (Easterby-Smith et al, 2004;Fernandez et al, 2012). That is, discarding obsolete knowledge is critical for gaining new knowledge; thus, the inefficiency with which many organizations promote unlearning is evidence of a crucial weakness (Hedberg, 1981).…”
Section: Unlearningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework of Argyris and Schön (1974, 1978 complements this model by explicitly furthering insight into two of these aspects and implicitly supporting two others. More in general, Argyris and Schön were the first to depart from a purely descriptive, academic-oriented approach to analyzing organizational learning and to adopt a more prescriptive, practice-oriented approach to developing learning organizations (EasterbySmith and Lyles 2003;Easterby-Smith et al 2004;Tsang 1997). The army case involved is the Polish campaign and its aftermath (1939)(1940), which case more than later German operations shows the significance of learning from past events for future performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hedberg () argued that discarding obsolete knowledge is critical for gaining new knowledge, and the lack of ability to engage in unlearning is a crucial weakness of many organizations. The idea behind unlearning is that the inability to forget may become a major hindrance to further learning or innovation (Easterby‐Smith et al ., ; Fernandez et al ., ). According to Akgun et al .…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%