2016
DOI: 10.17654/bo013020135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing Convenient Boundary Functions for Anti-Infective Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Almendra-Arao et al (Almendra-Arao et al, 2016), difference between proportions, the FDA step function as well as the proportions ratio are not very useful dissimilarity measures from the point of view under consideration in this work. For that reason, we will not compare the new proposal with those.…”
Section: Comparison Of the New Proposal With Some Useful Non-inferiormentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As seen in Almendra-Arao et al (Almendra-Arao et al, 2016), difference between proportions, the FDA step function as well as the proportions ratio are not very useful dissimilarity measures from the point of view under consideration in this work. For that reason, we will not compare the new proposal with those.…”
Section: Comparison Of the New Proposal With Some Useful Non-inferiormentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Almendra-Arao et al (Almendra-Arao et al, 2016) have also noted that the other dissimilarity measures that behave well are the Röhmel's proposals. In this section we compare the family of boundary functions proposed in this work with Röhmel's proposals, doing these comparisons in the same way as in previous section, that is, by setting the difference between the areas of the corresponding margin functions equal to zero.…”
Section: Difference Between Areas To Röhmel's Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations