Constructing evidence at Prime Minister's Question Time: An analysis of the grammar, semantics and pragmatics of the verb see

Abstract

Constructing evidence constitutes a practice to establish the speaker's authority at Prime Minister's Question Time (PMQT), a weekly half-hour session in the British House of Commons. Here the verb see constitutes a resource for both the questioning Leader of the Opposition (LO) and Members of Parliament (MP) as well as for the responding Prime Minister (PM) to claim first-hand perceptual experience. This paper takes an integrated approach, offering a combined analysis of the grammatical formatting, semantics and pragmatics of the verb see in the context of evidential moves at PMQT. It shows how the verb see is functional in referring to the perceptual basis of a claim made and how its grammatical formatting is reflective of the contingencies of the local interactional context. The analysis is grounded in 32 sessions of PMQT (ca. 16 hrs of video-recordings). The results can be summarised as follows: 1) The evidential function of the verb is achieved through its context-specific grammatical formatting and semantics. 2) The reference to the perceptual basis of a claim evoked by see may co-occur with epistemic qualification and evaluative expressions. 3) The formatting of the verb may be indexical of the political relationship between the questioner and the responding PM.

Undercover Reporting on Refugees in European Union: Diegetic Narration

“…Thus, research activity of Shams Ul-Haq represents a special source of information about the events that are described; consequently, it represents a special manifestation of direct sociocultural 'evidentiality' (testimony) that is beginning to be considered as a communicative and pragmatic category in modern linguistic literature [16][17][18][19][20].…”

Pragmatic functions of evidentiality in diplomatic discourse: Toward a new analytical framework

“…However, it is dangerous to associate strength of evidence to its source type ( Fitneva, 2001 , p.404) or mode of knowing, though in general the reliability of the first category in each source is stronger than that of the second one. We need to take its “context-specific grammatical formatting and semantics” into consideration ( Reber, 2014 , p. 357).…”

“…The previous studies of evidentiality, however, have focused on “its formal or semantic properties in grammaticalized systems” ( Mushin, 2000 , p. 927), while few researchers focus their attention on the pragmatic functions of evidentiality in specific discourse contexts (e.g., Mushin, 2000 ; Hart, 2011 ; Marín-Arrese, 2011b ; Reber, 2014 ; see “background: evidentiality in discourse studies” for details).…”

‘Collaborative Competition’: Stance-taking and Positioning in the European Parliament

“…Previous work in this direction has particularly focused on Question Times 26 in national parliaments (Reber, 2014) and TV interviews with political leaders (Clayman and Heritage, 2002a;Heritage, 2002a). A somewhat dialogic approach to PI has been used in studies of cognition in interaction (e.g., Zima et al, 2009;.…”