2010
DOI: 10.1515/9783110226645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing Inequality in Multilingual Classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, we agree with Kubota (2014) and May (2014) in their belief that foregrounding individual agency at the expense of the socio-institutional and discursive dimensions that shape it (and get shaped by it) leads to individualized portrayals of social life, as happened in the case of Sita within media discourse. Consequently, these portrayals keep us from understanding how social groups get (re-)produced, negotiated and challenged (even if momentarily) over processes of allocation and distribution of (available) socio-economic resources, in the light of current intensification of mobility and the subsequent intensification of semiotic complexity of communicative and cultural practices (Blommaert 2013).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, we agree with Kubota (2014) and May (2014) in their belief that foregrounding individual agency at the expense of the socio-institutional and discursive dimensions that shape it (and get shaped by it) leads to individualized portrayals of social life, as happened in the case of Sita within media discourse. Consequently, these portrayals keep us from understanding how social groups get (re-)produced, negotiated and challenged (even if momentarily) over processes of allocation and distribution of (available) socio-economic resources, in the light of current intensification of mobility and the subsequent intensification of semiotic complexity of communicative and cultural practices (Blommaert 2013).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Under these circumstances, we call in this article for an approach to reflexivity which heavily draws on long-standing research in the language disciplines that stems from pioneering contributions from philosophy of language (Austin 1962), linguistic anthropology (Hymes 1974;Silverstein 1976), conversation analysis (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson 1974), interactional sociolinguistics (Gumperz 1982;Rampton 1995), microsociology (Goffman 1981), communication studies (Bakhtin 1986) and critical sociolinguistics (Heller 2002;Martín-Rojo 2010;Duchêne, Moyer & Roberts 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of linguistic and ethnographic perspectives is aligned with the presuppositions of those working in the fields of linguistic anthropology (Hymes 1974), interactional sociolinguistics (Gumperz 1982), microsociology (Goffman 1981;Erickson 1992), communication studies (Bakhtin 1986, Scollon & Scollon 2003 and critical sociolinguistics (Heller 2002;Martín-Rojo 2010;Duchene, Moyer & Roberts 2013). Therefore, when addressing reflexive practices, less emphasis is placed on mental states emanating from internal conversations that the researcher can access in research interviews.…”
Section: Youth and Social Change Through The Lens Of Linguistic Ethnomentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Desde hace un tiempo, no obstante, pueden encontrarse estudios que pretenden deshacer esta dicotomía, y se proponen el desarrollo de enfoques que tomen en cuenta las intersecciones entre las políticas y las prácticas lingüísticas, para poder dar cuenta empíricamente de las formas de relación entre ambos fenómenos (Blommaert, 2010;Codó, Patiño & Unamuno, 2012;Heller, 2001;Heller & Martin-Jones, 2001;MaCarty, 2010;Martín-Jones, 2011;Martín Rojo, 2010;Ricento, 2006;Unamuno, 2014;Zavala, 2012).…”
Section: El Estudio De Las Políticas Lingüístico-educativas Desde Perunclassified