2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00424.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing Interracial Families Through Intercountry Adoption*

Abstract: This article analyzes the role of race and ethnicity in constructing American families through intercountry adoption. We argue that such adoptions illustrate the fluidity and tenacity of specific racial boundaries in American families. Copyright (c) 2006 Southwestern Social Science Association.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly all parents interviewed and their partners were White, with the exception of one Asian American mother who had adopted a Black child and one partner who was White but of Hispanic ancestry (see Table for participant and adoptee characteristics). Participant's racial profiles were consistent with patterns in the United States in that White parents are more likely than non‐White parents to formally adopt children, whether domestically or abroad (Ishizawa, Kenney, Kubo, & Stevens, ). In terms of age, 31 of the parents were in their 40s or 50s; only two were in their 30s, and one was 67 years of age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Nearly all parents interviewed and their partners were White, with the exception of one Asian American mother who had adopted a Black child and one partner who was White but of Hispanic ancestry (see Table for participant and adoptee characteristics). Participant's racial profiles were consistent with patterns in the United States in that White parents are more likely than non‐White parents to formally adopt children, whether domestically or abroad (Ishizawa, Kenney, Kubo, & Stevens, ). In terms of age, 31 of the parents were in their 40s or 50s; only two were in their 30s, and one was 67 years of age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In 2000, 13% of adopted children in the United States were foreign‐born; of these, 48% were from Asia (Kreider, 2003). Individuals who adopt from Asia may do so because they feel that Asian children are more assimilable to mainstream (White) culture than other minority race children (Ishizawa, Kenney, Kubo, & Stevens, 2006). Shiao et al (2004) studied White adoptive parents of Korean children and found that parents often chose to adopt from Korea because of their perception that Korean children were “exotic yet assimilable” and “baggage free … and saveable” in contrast to African American children, who were viewed by some parents as unadoptable owing to perceived “damage, irredeemability, and marginalization” (pp.…”
Section: Racial Hierarchies and Racial Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or, non‐African American racial minorities may prefer children of their own race because they feel responsible for these children or are simply more comfortable adopting inracially. Indeed, most African Americans adopt African American children (Smith‐McKeever, 2006) and Hispanic persons who adopt internationally typically do so from Latin America (Ishizawa et al, 2006).…”
Section: Predictors Of Openness To Adopting An African American Childmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transracial adoption, adoption of children of one racial background by families of another racial background, has been met with much controversy in both South Africa and abroad (McRoy, Zurcher, Lauderdale & Anderson, 1982;Miller, 1999;Ledderboge, 1996;Ishizawa, Kenney, Kubo & Stevens, 2006). Miller (1999:66), for example, asks:…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%