2007
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.26586822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
819
0
26

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 963 publications
(853 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
819
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of oversimplifying, it is important to consider the problem on different levels, systemically [26]. Familiarizing oneself with the context is also an important step in better utilizing the empirical material to create theories [29], and there are calls for more systemic ways of expressing and using context in theory development [30]. This paper is a step towards creating a deeper contextual understanding of the wickedness of design of e-health systems for people diagnosed with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Wicked Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of oversimplifying, it is important to consider the problem on different levels, systemically [26]. Familiarizing oneself with the context is also an important step in better utilizing the empirical material to create theories [29], and there are calls for more systemic ways of expressing and using context in theory development [30]. This paper is a step towards creating a deeper contextual understanding of the wickedness of design of e-health systems for people diagnosed with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Wicked Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By switching between searching for patterns and searching for fragmentation without seeing the pattern as the final result, emphasis was placed on the dialogue between patterns and fragmentation. The object of study was considered as an unknown, exotic place, even as the approach in the study was not from a stranger's naive point of view (Alvesson & Kärreman, 2007). Service users were included in the analysis when earlier research indicated that they could bring unique perspectives and experiences to data interpretation (Sweeney, Greenwood, Williams, Wykes, & Rose, 2012).…”
Section: Procedures and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an ethical standpoint, the participants were spared from numerous observations if additional issues were raised along the way. Additionally, the participants had the opportunity to comment on their experience (Alvesson & Kärreman, 2007;Heath et al, 2010). …”
Section: Procedures and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We began our study in 2003 by becoming familiar with the research setting. We had a few interviews and discussions with management with a broad focus (Alvesson and Kärreman 2007). The overall focus was on the development of effective and efficient service provision within the organization.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we looked at the different types of services provided, iterating among in-depth analyses between the empirical material and theory (Alvesson and Kärreman 2007). Following Alvesson and Kärreman (2007), our empirical findings led to surprises and puzzles in relation to existing theory and our understanding, driving further analysis and theorizing (Agar 1996). Surprises and puzzles are important since they lead to breakdowns in current understanding when empirical findings cannot be explained by existing theory Kärreman 2007: 1270).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%