2005
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2005.0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing semisimple p -adic Galois representations with prescribed properties

Abstract: Consider a characteristic p representation of the absolute Galois group of the rational numbers. In this paper we show how to deform this representation to the p -adics while guaranteeing that the characteristic polynomials of Frobenius at a density one set of primes are algebraic and pure of specified weight. The resulting representation is ramified at an infinite (density zero) set of primes. As a consequence of the technique of proof we show that one can compatibly lift a mod pq representation. Again, the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Fact 2.3 below can be found in [R1, §3]. See also [KLR1,§2]. 1) for i = 0, 1, 2 and have dimensions 1, 2 and 1, respectively.…”
Section: Recollectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof of Fact 2.3 below can be found in [R1, §3]. See also [KLR1,§2]. 1) for i = 0, 1, 2 and have dimensions 1, 2 and 1, respectively.…”
Section: Recollectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof That Q comes from a Chebotarev condition follows from [R1,Lemma 10] which gives that the splitting conditions of Proposition 2.2 are independent of those imposed by ζ and the ζ i . See also [KLR1,Lemma 6].…”
Section: The Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the length of the argument below is because of this. That we do not know whether we have to allow ramification at one or two nice primes to remove obstructions to deformation problems here and in [8] is the same phenomenon. 5.5.1.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The proof of Theorem 20 is more involved than the proof of Theorem 11. Essential use is made of the techniques of [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that Conjecture 1.1 is certainly false for many infinitely ramified Galois representations, as by [6] it is possible to control the Frobenius polynomials (and thus the a p (ρ)) at a set of primes of density one.…”
Section: Conjecture 11 Let ρ Be a Motivic Galois Representation As Amentioning
confidence: 99%