A pragmatic (rather than merely ‘extended’) perspective on
internet user values regards both the value(s) of the interaction and those of its
results. Firstly, a pragmatic evaluation presupposes that the interactants are
agreed on what to evaluate and how, which implies
the values being ordered in a ‘ranking’ according to importance. On the internet,
such values depend on ‘likes’ or ‘hits’; the number of times a contribution has been
accessed, even if negatively (in a so-called ‘shit storm’) makes it important.
Secondly, being based on ranking, the evaluation is pragmatic:
values are not a priori given, but emerge in interaction. Ranking presupposes the
users’ accepting society’s values and collaborating in their creation; on the
internet, this is done through ‘meaning making’ activities like ‘texting,’
‘tweeting,’ or ‘instagramming.’ Current evaluation, in contrast to earlier, is
ubiquitous, continuous, and accessible by i-Phone, i-Pad or other social-mediatic
devices. Access and speed are important here; one cannot with impunity disregard a
tweet, a writing on one’s Facebook, or an Instagram sent by one of one’s
contacts.