1995
DOI: 10.2307/1180017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing the Margins: Of Multicultural Education and Curriculum Settlements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, minorities cannot reject the national ethos, although they can seek, and often succeed, to modify it. (The ways this can be achieved – as well as the difficulties involved – can be studied when various national states undertake to rewrite the textbooks used in schools, which include parts that offend various minorities, and when debates take place as to which works colleges should include in their ‘core’ curriculum (Carlson, 1995, pp. 407–431; Gillespie, 2003; Huntington, 2004, pp.…”
Section: Diversity Within Unitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, minorities cannot reject the national ethos, although they can seek, and often succeed, to modify it. (The ways this can be achieved – as well as the difficulties involved – can be studied when various national states undertake to rewrite the textbooks used in schools, which include parts that offend various minorities, and when debates take place as to which works colleges should include in their ‘core’ curriculum (Carlson, 1995, pp. 407–431; Gillespie, 2003; Huntington, 2004, pp.…”
Section: Diversity Within Unitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public schooling, and within it the work of teachers, is undergoing dramatic changes at the moment, and mostly for reasons that reside a long way from classrooms, curriculum, pedagogy and learning. We believe that to understand what is happening, any analysis must get inside the culture of teachers' work (Carlson, 1992) and regard teaching as a form of 'cultural work' (Anyon, 1998). Michael Apple (1996a) has written extensively of the importance of directing our attention to the various elements of this perspective: 'economic goals and values; visions of both the family and race, gender and class relations; the politics of culture, difference and identity; and the role of the state in all of this ' (p. 18).…”
Section: The Process Of Economic Globalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is seen to involve responsible and non-political behaviour (Lawn, 1987), and a 'professional' work ethic. Since that time the ideology of professionalism has been used to create a sense of separation of teachers from other workers and indeed from each other, to reaffirm a scientific rationality through the notion of 'expert', and an acceptance of an increasing work load (Densmore, 1987;Popkewitz and Lind, 1989;Carlson, 1992). Feminist scholars have also viewed 'professionalism' as a social and historical construct, but they stress the ways in which it privileges a masculinized discourse of scientific measurement and control, at the expense of the nurturant and expressive work that women do (Freedman, 1990;Weiler, 1995).…”
Section: Ideological Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We understand these con¯icts over multiculturalism as part of a broader American cultural and social questioning of identity, history and community (Carlson 1995, Fraser 1995. While scholars articulate a range of objectives, approaches and intended outcomes (Cummins 1986, Gollnick 1992, Banks 1993, Grant and Sleeter 1993, McCormick 1994, what occurs in US university classrooms under the title of multicultural teacher education, and what e ects such courses may have, are only beginning to be attended to.…”
Section: En Te Rin G Th E Spac E Of M U Ltic U Ltu Ral Te Ac H E R E mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our discursive analysis of classroom discussions and interpretations is intended to pay close attention to the speci® cs of the pedagogic encounter and the active construction of knowledge and meaning that take place within distinctive classroom relationships (Carlson 1995), while we also examine how that knowledge is constrained by epistemological and discursive limits and structures. We hope that this interrogation of our owǹ confusing and tension-® lled classrooms' (Weiler 1991: 450) contributes to the ongoing critical discourse on multiculturalism and pedagogy.…”
Section: En Te Rin G Th E Spac E Of M U Ltic U Ltu Ral Te Ac H E R E mentioning
confidence: 99%