2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-021-03031-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing three-qubit unitary gates in terms of Schmidt rank and CNOT gates

Abstract: It is known that every two-qubit unitary operation has Schmidt rank one, two or four, and the construction of three-qubit unitary gates in terms of Schmidt rank remains an open problem. We explicitly construct the gates of Schmidt rank from one to seven. It turns out that the threequbit Toffoli and Fredkin gate respectively have Schmidt rank two and four. As an application, we implement the gates using quantum circuits of CNOT gates and local Hadamard and flip gates. In particular, the collective use of three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are linearly independent local operations acting on respective parties. The smallest possible m is defined as Schmidt rank Schfalse(scriptUfalse)$\text{Sch}(\mathcal {U})$, [ 32 ] which can be used for quantifying the nonlocality of U$\mathcal {U}$ defined by KHar(U)log2[Schfalse(scriptUfalse)]$K_{\text{Har}}(\mathcal {U})\equiv \log _2[\text{Sch}(\mathcal {U})]$, [ 33–35 ] providing a sufficient condition for when U$\mathcal {U}$ is a controlled‐unitary operation, [ 36–42 ] and optimizing the synthesis of quantum computation [ 43 ] and quantum transistors. [ 30 ] Another common approach, called synthesis or quantum circuit, is to factorize U$\mathcal {U}$ into fewer achievable simple local and nonlocal operations from a universal library, which may simplify such physical implementations: scriptU=X1X2Xm$\mathcal {U}= X_1 X_2 \cdots X_m$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are linearly independent local operations acting on respective parties. The smallest possible m is defined as Schmidt rank Schfalse(scriptUfalse)$\text{Sch}(\mathcal {U})$, [ 32 ] which can be used for quantifying the nonlocality of U$\mathcal {U}$ defined by KHar(U)log2[Schfalse(scriptUfalse)]$K_{\text{Har}}(\mathcal {U})\equiv \log _2[\text{Sch}(\mathcal {U})]$, [ 33–35 ] providing a sufficient condition for when U$\mathcal {U}$ is a controlled‐unitary operation, [ 36–42 ] and optimizing the synthesis of quantum computation [ 43 ] and quantum transistors. [ 30 ] Another common approach, called synthesis or quantum circuit, is to factorize U$\mathcal {U}$ into fewer achievable simple local and nonlocal operations from a universal library, which may simplify such physical implementations: scriptU=X1X2Xm$\mathcal {U}= X_1 X_2 \cdots X_m$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%