2018
DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing whole of population cohorts for health and social research using the New Zealand Integrated Data Infrastructure

Abstract: The New Zealand IDI population is the most comprehensive and appropriate national cohort for use in health and social research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study area comprises the Northland and Auckland regions of NZ, which include four DHBs, namely Northland, Waitemata, Auckland and Counties Manukau. The study relates to the 1‐year period from the 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2013 and includes 1,679,703 (1,582,881 for census resident population in 2013) people, comprising more than 37% of the total resident IDI population of NZ (Zhao et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The study area comprises the Northland and Auckland regions of NZ, which include four DHBs, namely Northland, Waitemata, Auckland and Counties Manukau. The study relates to the 1‐year period from the 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2013 and includes 1,679,703 (1,582,881 for census resident population in 2013) people, comprising more than 37% of the total resident IDI population of NZ (Zhao et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A population cohort was constructed from multiple data sources in the IDI for the study area using an “activity‐based” approach. Activity here refers to individuals' interactions with a particular public service (e.g., health, immigration, education), and can be used to determine whether individuals were “active”, that is, present and resident, in NZ (Gibb, Bycroft, & Matheson‐Dunning, ; Zhao et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations