Construction and demolition waste (C&amp;DW) in India: generation rate and implications of C&amp;DW recycling

Jain, Sourabh; Singhal, Sonica; Jain, Nikunj Kumar

doi:10.1080/15623599.2018.1523300

Cited by 52 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From a source perspective, such value merely included those C&D waste generated from large-scale projects and construction activities in Beijing, and those from small generators (e.g., decoration for private apartments and houses) were mixed with municipal solid waste according to related legislation (PGBM, 2020). In this context, the scale of C&D waste generation in Beijing was about half that of Shanghai (Shanghai Construction Muck Comprehensive Service Monitoring Platform, (2020), one-third of India (Jain et al, 2018), and one-tenth of the United States (Environmental Protection Agency, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction and demolition wastes in Beijing: Where they come from and where they go?

Chen

Liu

2020

Waste Manag Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urbanization and related construction activities generate massive construction and demolition (C&D) waste, which poses considerable risks to the environment and human health. However, it is difficult to assess the significance of these issues without a quantitative understanding of spatial patterns of C&D waste generation (source), transportation (flow), and treatment (sink). This paper maps source, sinks, and flows of C&D waste by coupling a geographic information system and material flow analysis. The methodology is new in the field of C&D waste quantification at the city level, especially downscaling to 5 km × 5 km grids. The results showed that a total of 37.72 million metric tonnes (Mt) of C&D wastes were generated in Beijing, 2019, and ~72% of them were reused and recycled. In space, C&D waste generation in suburban and rural districts (28.73 Mt) was over three times more than that in the downtown area (8.99 Mt). However, the downtown area was the net source region and transported massive amounts of C&D waste to suburban and rural districts. In comparison, several suburban and rural districts had self-sufficient treatment capacity. Our study highlights that a series of C&D waste maps on multiple spatial scales are of great help to design effective policies for waste management by providing spatial details of magnitude and components, and explicitly recognizing primary source and sink areas in cities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction and demolition wastes in Beijing: Where they come from and where they go?

Chen

Liu

2020

Waste Manag Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, when incinerating CDW and recycling fly ash into alternative cement products, the process itself is energy intensive and discharges multiple air pollutants. 77,78 While some material recycling processes can reduce specific environmental impacts, some recycling treatments cause significant environmental burdens. 79 For instance, concrete recycling may reduce acidification outputs, but this activity has significant land consumption requirements.…”

Section: Life Cycle Thinking To Avoid Pitfallsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Life Cycle Thinking Framework to Mitigate the Environmental Impact of Building Materials

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urbanization and population growth have contributed to a tripling of building material consumption from 2000 to 2017. Building materials have a range of environmental impacts throughout their life cycle, from extraction, processing, and transport of raw materials to building construction, use, and eventual demolition and waste. Mitigation measures that target specific materials or value chain stages may therefore have incremental or even adverse net environmental effects. In this perspective, we develop a framework for applying life cycle thinking to identify key impacts and corresponding mitigation approaches, inform building design and material selection, and ensure effective treatment and recycling of construction and demolition wastes. Life cycle evaluation can also be used to assess and avoid environmental trade-offs among life cycle stages. Challenges for implementing these life cycle principles include collecting and integrating inventory data for products, managing multiple stakeholders within the construction industry, and monitoring end-of-life impacts; measures for overcoming such challenges are discussed.

show abstract

“…They forecast the generation of waste in 2018 as around 196 million tonnes from construction waste and 192 million tonnes from demolition waste around the country. Jain et al (2018) made estimations to C&D waste under some scenarios to India, calculating an average of 289 million tonnes of construction waste in view of 2016 data. Using data from 17 countries, Menegaki and Damigos (2018) developed a regression model relating C&D waste per capita with construction gross domestic product (GDP), GDP per capita, and population density.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling waste generated during construction of buildings using regression analysis

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The building industry is responsible for a large amount of waste, and the measurement and modelling of this waste could be used to develop better waste management plans. Several theoretical models explain the relationships between waste and building characteristics, but local practices may result in different behaviours. This study aimed to measure and analyse the waste generated through construction. It was based on the analysis of 18 building sites located in the region of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Waste was measured at these sites, and the results showed an average waste generation rate of 0.151 m3 m-2. A regression analysis of the collected data presented a satisfactory performance in two models. The first model was developed to explain total waste generation, including the effects of certain attributes, with an R2 = 0.81. The changes in waste generated during construction were estimated. The second model considered time schedules and examined the effect of the construction stage on waste generation, and reached an R2 = 0.91. The model with time indicated an S-shaped relationship. The models presented satisfactory statistical parameters and could be used to produce better waste management plans in the preconstruction stage.

show abstract

Construction and demolition waste (C&DW) in India: generation rate and implications of C&DW recycling

Cited by 52 publications

References 37 publications

Construction and demolition wastes in Beijing: Where they come from and where they go?

Construction and demolition wastes in Beijing: Where they come from and where they go?

A Life Cycle Thinking Framework to Mitigate the Environmental Impact of Building Materials

Modelling waste generated during construction of buildings using regression analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About