Construction and dissemination of information veracity on French social media during crises: Comparison of Twitter and Wikipedia

Abstract

In the crisis management literature information shared on social media during a crisis is relevant both to emergency agencies, when it establishes a more accurate situational awareness, and to citizens, when it enables a collective and coherent approach to the event (e.g. Stieglitz, Bunker, Mirbabaie & Ehnis, 2018, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(1), 4). Social media is, however, also considered as a place where “noise” and fake news can be dispensed (e.g., Alexander, 2014, Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3), 717; Starbird, 2017, https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15603). In this paper, we analyse contributions on Wikipedia and Twitter during major crises in France through online ethnographies and semi‐structured interviews to investigate their roles in building and sharing information. Wikipedia has often been analysed as a collaborative tool but this approach has underestimated its use in reducing uncertainty in times of crisis. We demonstrate that despite their distinct pace and designs, Twitter and Wikipedia are used with seriousness by citizens in their dissemination of information. We also explain how social media change the landscape of means of communication for official institutions and citizens, and that they can be used in the same way. Finally, we stress the need for official institutions to integrate social media in their practices and interactions with citizens that they involve.

Unveiling virtual chat group inclusiveness code of conduct by Nigerians

“…The innate ability to accurately record discussion data in text format as well as provide a safe, secure and anonymous environment for participants makes VFGDs amenable to a variety of qualitative data (Turney and Pocknee, 2005). As noted by Simon (1999), Krueger (2002), Bryman (2012) and HERD Team (2016), VFGDs are now possible with the advent of the internet. This was the case in this study as participants were drawn across Nigeria irrespective of distance, beliefs and backgrounds, among other factors.…”

“…Nevertheless, face validity and concurrent validity instrument of data collection was assured by a vigorous process. As noted by Bryman (2012), only participants who showed interest after a preliminary briefing were recruited for the actual VFGD. Following Bryman's (2012) guide towards overall validity and reliability of data, there were six to eight discussants in each five VFGDs.…”

“…As noted by Bryman (2012), only participants who showed interest after a preliminary briefing were recruited for the actual VFGD. Following Bryman's (2012) guide towards overall validity and reliability of data, there were six to eight discussants in each five VFGDs. The moderator was not intrusive.…”

“…Research elsewhere has even advocated for the inclusion of social media into the mainstream official corporate (institutional) information practices and interactions with citizens. Relative findings have also shown that if and when used properly, social media and other new information communication technologies do have and retain the capacities for ethical management of social and corporate information crisis (Bubendorff et al , 2021).…”

The role of Wikipedia in the dissemination of new knowledge: Analysis of the entry «desinformación» as a changeable concept

“…Research such as that of Bubendorff et al (2021) points out that citizens can organize themselves to participate in decision-making in times of crisis and, in the case of Wikipedia, through the progressive construction of knowledge. Trust in these collective contributions would be guaranteed by the availability of fact-checking mechanisms (Pérez-Escolar et al, 2021).…”