2022
DOI: 10.18632/aging.203974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and evaluation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with lung cancer

Abstract: Background: Lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a severe disease burden. Because the prognosis of patients with lung cancer varies, it is critical to identify effective biomarkers for prognosis prediction. Methods: A total of 2325 lung cancer patients were integrated into four independent sets (training set, validation set I, II and III) after removing batch effects in our study. We applied the microarray data algorithm to screen the differentially expressed genes in the training set. The mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we developed and validated a simple and reliable tool to predict the survival 1-,2-, and Our results suggest that stage tumor is a risk factor for lung cancer OS, which is easy to understand, and that OS is certainly shorter in stage patients than in stage -patients. This result is consistent with previous research results (Ouyang et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In the present study, we developed and validated a simple and reliable tool to predict the survival 1-,2-, and Our results suggest that stage tumor is a risk factor for lung cancer OS, which is easy to understand, and that OS is certainly shorter in stage patients than in stage -patients. This result is consistent with previous research results (Ouyang et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The present survival analyses based on DSS, DFI and PFI in PDAC were consistent with previous reports ( Fig. 1 ; Table I ) ( 27 , 28 ). Notably, the present results revealed that patients with SLC20A1 high showed a poorer prognosis than patients with SLC20A1 low at tumor stage I.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%