2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and retrieval of evaluative judgments: The attitude strength moderation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, measures of attitudes (e.g., ratings) toward products or brands are likely to be noisy measures, and thus noisy predictors of future attitudes and preferences. At the same time, like preferences, some attitudes are particularly strong, stable, and well‐defined (Nayakankuppam et al., 2018). However, as with preferences, in such cases, prediction is likely to be less interesting and less useful for marketers because these attitudes will be less susceptible to influence by marketers, at least in the short term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, measures of attitudes (e.g., ratings) toward products or brands are likely to be noisy measures, and thus noisy predictors of future attitudes and preferences. At the same time, like preferences, some attitudes are particularly strong, stable, and well‐defined (Nayakankuppam et al., 2018). However, as with preferences, in such cases, prediction is likely to be less interesting and less useful for marketers because these attitudes will be less susceptible to influence by marketers, at least in the short term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on this particular context since we are interested in exploring whether accent may impede social mobility and professional advancement. As prior work in both linguistics and psychology has demonstrated, attitudes to language and other forms of socially meaningful practice are contextually situated, such that the evaluation of a behavior in one context does not necessarily apply in another (Gawronski, Ye, Rydell & De Houwer 2014;Nayakakuppam, Priester, Kwon, Donovan & Petty 2018;Hilton & Jeong 2019;Levon & Ye 2020). It is therefore not possible to assume that attitudes to language in a professional context will match those elicited in a more general (or "neutral") context (Ajzen 1991(Ajzen , 2005Campbell-Kibler 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fazio’s attitude theory, the effect of priming depends on attitude strength (i.e., strong attitudes are more easily retrieved from memory; Fazio, 1995; Nayakankuppam et al., 2018). Attitude strength determines attitude accessibility (i.e., the ease with which an attitude is activated; Fazio et al., 1986).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fazio's attitude theory, the effect of priming depends on attitude strength (i.e., strong attitudes are more easily retrieved from memory; Fazio, 1995;Nayakankuppam et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theore Ti C Al Backg Roundmentioning
confidence: 99%