A Geologic Time Scale 2004 2005
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511536045.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and summary of the geologic time scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
465
1
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(489 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
465
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Down-core studies of several marine microfossil groups, high-latitude vegetation data and evidence of higher-than-present sea level suggested that this was the most recent interval in which consistent and significant warmer-than-present conditions existed in the geological past (Dowsett et al 1994). With the addition of the geomagnetic polarity time scale of Berggren et al (1995), the astronomically tuned time scale of Lourens et al (1996) and abundant data indicating warmer-than-present conditions on a global scale, the PRISM interval chronology was recalibrated to 3.29-2.97 Ma (time scale of Gradstein et al 2004; figure 1).…”
Section: Reconstruction Methods and Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Down-core studies of several marine microfossil groups, high-latitude vegetation data and evidence of higher-than-present sea level suggested that this was the most recent interval in which consistent and significant warmer-than-present conditions existed in the geological past (Dowsett et al 1994). With the addition of the geomagnetic polarity time scale of Berggren et al (1995), the astronomically tuned time scale of Lourens et al (1996) and abundant data indicating warmer-than-present conditions on a global scale, the PRISM interval chronology was recalibrated to 3.29-2.97 Ma (time scale of Gradstein et al 2004; figure 1).…”
Section: Reconstruction Methods and Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While largely being characterized by pelagic sedimentation, turbidity flows and reworking by contour currents were common during the early and middle Miocene at this site [Milkert et al, 1996]. The latter processes might have caused some mixing of sediments, which may also account for discrepancies noted for the planktonic foraminifera [Gervais, 1996] and calcareous nannoplankton zonations [de Kaenel and Villa, 1996] relative to the absolute age given by Gradstein et al [2004] (Table 1e and Figure 2b). Nevertheless, oxygen isotope compositions of foraminifera [Mühlstrasser, 2002] are compatible with early to middle Miocene climatic changes.…”
Section: Odp Site 900mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several seaways opened and closed between the Mediterranean and the Paratethys during the See also Tables 1a-1e for further details. The stages and planktonic foraminifera zones are after Gradstein et al [2004] and Rögl [1998]. The different marks for the sampled layers indicate those where both fossils and sediments (crosses), only fossils (horizontal dashes), or only sediments (vertical dashes) were involved in the isotope measurements.…”
Section: Mediterraneanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example the model has a feature 'GeologicEvent' described by the three properties eventAge, eventEnvironment and eventProcess. The eventAge property can be encoded using values from the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) stratigraphic time chart, produced from the geologic time scale (Gradstein et al, 2004). This is an example of an internationally agreed set of concept definitions, and has been implemented in GeoSciML.…”
Section: Geosciml Is Useful Even Without Full Semantic Interoperabilimentioning
confidence: 99%