1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1982.tb01351.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and Validation of a Simplified, Group-administerable Equivalent to the Moral Judgment Interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a difference between such groups has been more often reported when production instruments are used (Basinger, Gibbs, & Fuller, 1995;Gavaghan et al, 1983;Gibbs, Widaman, & Colby, 1982;Gregg, Gibbs, & Basinger, 1994;Palmer & Hollin, 1998;Palmer & Hollin, 2000). There is scope in considering whether or not The Sociomoral Reflection Measure -Short Form (Gibbs, Basinger, & Fuller, 1992), which is a modern production instrument of moral reasoning, can be used with people who have IDs, as this measure has been successfully used with young children (Gibbs et al, 2007) and can be administered as an interview, negating the need for reading and writing.…”
Section: Moral Development 27mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In contrast, a difference between such groups has been more often reported when production instruments are used (Basinger, Gibbs, & Fuller, 1995;Gavaghan et al, 1983;Gibbs, Widaman, & Colby, 1982;Gregg, Gibbs, & Basinger, 1994;Palmer & Hollin, 1998;Palmer & Hollin, 2000). There is scope in considering whether or not The Sociomoral Reflection Measure -Short Form (Gibbs, Basinger, & Fuller, 1992), which is a modern production instrument of moral reasoning, can be used with people who have IDs, as this measure has been successfully used with young children (Gibbs et al, 2007) and can be administered as an interview, negating the need for reading and writing.…”
Section: Moral Development 27mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Taking the average over two or more dilemmas is a common procedure also used by Kohlberg (Colby & Kohlberg, 1987), Rest (1979), and Gibbs (Gibbs, Widaman, & Colby, 1982). An analysis both per set of statements separately and for the combination of three sets is provided.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%