2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.957655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and validation of a novel coagulation-related 7-gene prognostic signature for gastric cancer

Abstract: Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the most common malignant tumor. Due to the lack of practical molecular markers, the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer is still poor. A number of studies have confirmed that the coagulation system is closely related to tumor progression. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to construct a coagulation-related gene signature and prognostic model for GC by bioinformatics methods.Methods: We downloaded the gene expression and clinical data of GC patients from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, it has become a growing focus for research to construct prognostic models based on coagulation system to predict the prognostic or diagnostic value in tumors 5,17,25,26 . However, the power of prognostic prediction of LUAD patients using our signature is better than their signatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nowadays, it has become a growing focus for research to construct prognostic models based on coagulation system to predict the prognostic or diagnostic value in tumors 5,17,25,26 . However, the power of prognostic prediction of LUAD patients using our signature is better than their signatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To compare the performance of CRRS with other coagulation‐related signatures, we comprehensively retrieved published signatures, including Jin's model with 11 signatures (SERPINA1, CFHR3, PPP1CB, P2RX1, PLCB3, PLCB4, PIK3R6, GP6, PIK3R1, GP1BA, PLA2G4F) in HCC, 17 Chen's model with seven signatures (SERPINE1, VWF, F2R, ANXA5, CD59, AXL, MMRN1) in gastric cancer, 25 Jia's model with four signatures (SERPINA1, HMGCS2, MMP7, PLAT) in invasive ductal cancer, 26 Song's model with seven signatures (ANG, C1QA, CFB, DUSP6, KLKB1, MMP7, RABIF) in melanoma 5 . The AUC mean values for Jin's model, Chen's model, Jia's model, Song's model and the CRRS were 0.641, 0.655, 0.569, 0.486 and 0.696.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The “oligo” R package was used to preprocess (background correction, log transformation and normalization) the raw gene expression profiles for downstream analyses. Besides, 185 human CGs were sourced from AmiGO2 database ( http://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo ) [ 55 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation process for the immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis is referred to in our previous report [45]. The primary antibodies were anti-RPS24 (rabbit, 1:100, ABclonal Technology, Wuhan, China, A12123) and anti-Ki67 (rabbit, 1:7000, Proteintech, Wuhan, China 14831-1-AP).…”
Section: Immunohistochemistry (Ihc)mentioning
confidence: 99%