Construction and validation of an educational video for patients in the perioperative period of robotic surgery

Abstract

Objectives: to build and validate educational technology, of the video type, aimed at teaching about the perioperative period of robotic surgery. Methods: methodological development study, following the integrative review phases: pre-production, production, post-production, and validation. The video was evaluated for content and appearance by 14 judges. Content validity (CVI) and appearance (AVI) and agreement (CI) indices were calculated, and the exact binomial test was applied, considering p>0.05 and a proportion of 0.80 of agreement. Results: the video included 13 themes, with a duration of seven minutes and 33 seconds. The items of the three dimensions evaluated presented excellent CVI, ranging between 0.86 and 1.00 (p>0.05), with a total CVI of 0.95, VAT of 0.94 and CI equal to 61.5%. Conclusions: the video included 13 themes, with a duration of seven minutes and 33 seconds. The items of the three dimensions evaluated presented excellent CVI, ranging between 0.86 and 1.00 (p>0.05), with a total CVI of 0.95, VAT of 0.94 and CI equal to 61.5%.

Systematization of perioperative nursing care in robotic surgery: instrument validation

“…Part II of the instrument was elaborated with questions on the content evaluation regarding comprehension, coherence of information, language, presentation and layout, ease of handling, with items distributed in three blocks and a field for general comments and suggestions (2,17,19) .…”

“…This includes its overall organization, structure, presentation strategy, coherence, and formatting. Finally, Block 3 refers to relevance, with three items related to the characteristics that assess the degree of significance of the care material presented (2,17,19) .…”

“…In the third stage, the following classification was considered in two groups: 1) content judges/expert judges (professionals with expertise in the topic addressed); and 2) target audience (nurses of the service). It was important, for the validation of the content, that the judges were qualified to evaluate the relevance and representativeness of the content to compose the technology (2,(16)(17)(18) .…”

“…The scientific literature recommends a minimum number of five experts; thus, 11 expert judges and 7 evaluators of the target audience participated (2,(16)(17) .…”

“…The use of technological innovations in health care has increased significantly in recent years, especially regarding surgical interventions. The surgical modality highlighted is robotic surgery, which aims to provide the benefits of this minimally invasive technique, combined with the lower risk of complications (1)(2)(3)(4) .…”