“…Furthermore, it has been observed that, by driving selection of prototrophs by defective markers (with truncated promoter region; ura3d or leu2d ), one can increase the copy number of an integrated heterologous sequence (Le Dall et al ., ; Juretzek et al ., ; Nicaud et al ., ), which offers a relatively straightforward technique for amplification of gene expression. Currently, a significant workload is being devoted to developing potent episomal plasmids (primary studies by Fournier et al ., ; Nicaud et al ., ), which earlier used to have low copy number and cause stability problems (Liu et al ., ), improved native promoters (Blazeck et al ., , ), or surface‐display vectors (Bulani et al ., ; Duquesne et al ., ; Yue et al ., ), altogether making Y. lipolytica a competitive expression platform compared to conventional yeasts. Several advantageous traits distinguish Y. lipolytica from the other expression systems available, such as a highly efficient co‐translational secretion mechanism, high expression and secretion capacity (Tobe et al ., ), regularity of performance, lower glycosylation in comparison with S. cerevisiae (Jolivet et al ., ), with probable lack of an immunogenic α 1,3‐mannose linkage (Song et al ., ).…”