To
compare the differences in chemical structure between
vitrinite
and inertinite and their effects on transformation and utilization,
this paper separated vitrinite and inertinite from three parent coal
samples (high-volatile bituminous coal (
R
max
(%)
=
0.65), medium-volatile bituminous coal (
R
max
(%)
=
1.25), and low-volatile
bituminous coal (
R
max
(%)
=
1.7)), and the differences in chemical structure were analyzed from
three aspects: aromatic structure, aliphatic structure, and cross-linking
structure. The molecular structure model of a single maceral was constructed,
and the chemical bond parameters and the impact on coal conversion
and utilization were analyzed. The results showed that (i) in the
same sample, inertinite has advanced evolution characteristics, higher
aromaticity, and ring condensation degree, but vitrinite has a faster
evolution rate than inertinite. (ii) The molecular structure model
shows that with the increase of the evolution degree of samples, the
proportion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons increased gradually.
After molecular dynamics simulations, the cross-linked structures
in the planar macromolecular structure have huge torsion deformation,
and the torsion of aromatic structure decreased from benzene, naphthalene,
anthracene, and phenanthrene. (iii) The analysis of chemical bond
parameters showed that the ether–oxygen bond with shorter bond
length and higher bond energy is a key factor hindering the breakage
recombination of the macromolecular structure. In the high-evolution
stage, the ether carbon content in inertinite is higher than that
in vitrinite and has a stronger cross-linking structure. Therefore,
it is less reactive in the transformation processes of coking and
gasification. However, inertinite has larger aromatic layers and a
more ordered orientation, which has certain advantages in the preparation
of coal-based graphite.