2012
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2012)106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of bulk fields with gauge redundancy

Abstract: We extend the construction of field operators in AdS as smeared single trace operators in the boundary CFT to gauge fields and gravity. Bulk field operators in a fixed gauge can be thought of as non-local gauge invariant observables. Non-local commutators result from the Gauss' law constraint, which for gravity implies a perturbative notion of holography. We work out these commutators in a generalized Coulomb gauge and obtain leading order smearing functions in radial gauge.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
133
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inversion formula gives a CFT representation for a local bulk operator at a point, which is defined invariantly on the boundary as the intersection locus of a family of geodesics. 13 We find that this representation of the bulk operator is exactly equivalent to the HKLL prescription [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]: the geodesic operators deconstruct the HKLL representation into contributions of separate causal diamonds.…”
Section: Jhep07(2016)129 4 Construction Of Bulk Local Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The inversion formula gives a CFT representation for a local bulk operator at a point, which is defined invariantly on the boundary as the intersection locus of a family of geodesics. 13 We find that this representation of the bulk operator is exactly equivalent to the HKLL prescription [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]: the geodesic operators deconstruct the HKLL representation into contributions of separate causal diamonds.…”
Section: Jhep07(2016)129 4 Construction Of Bulk Local Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Following [43,44], we do this by choosing a cutoff surface at large but finite radius, with induced metric S d−1 × R, and then specifying bulk points by sending in spacelike geodesics from the t = 0 slice of this cutoff surface that start out orthogonal to the S d−1 directions. We then take the limit as the cutoff surface approaches the boundary.…”
Section: Defining Local Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any such construction will at best be perturbative in the gravitational coupling constant, which I will refer to as 1/N . For small numbers of operators any backreaction can be treated perturbatively, so by an appropriate gauge fixing [32,33] we can treat the bulk theory as a quantum field theory in curved spacetime (the gravitons will JHEP11(2014)055 just be another matter field). It will be an effective field theory with nontrivial irrelevant operators appearing that are suppressed by powers of 1/N ; their coefficients can in principle be determined by comparison with the CFT.…”
Section: The Basics Of Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if I don't know you are going to do this, then my O operators are automatically redefined in such a way that I see a smooth horizon when I jump in, even though the quantum state of the black hole is the same in either case. The full state of 32 These are the types of equilibrium states one would construct acting on |ψ with the "unitary behind the horizon" type operators discussed in section 3, but here I will follow the rules of PR and construct mirror operators which see the "horizon" as unexcited.…”
Section: Including the Infalling Observermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation