2023
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Coculture System Containing Escherichia coli with Different Microbial Species for Biochemical Production

Abstract: Microbial synthesis of target chemicals usually involves multienzymatic reactions in vivo, especially for compounds with a long metabolic pathway. However, when various genes are introduced into one single strain, it leads to a heavy metabolic burden. In contrast, the microbial coculture system can allocate metabolic pathways into different hosts, which will relieve the metabolic burdens. Escherichia coli is the most used chassis to synthesize biofuels and chemicals owing to its well-known genetics, high trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Providing an additional carbon source that is only accessible to one partner of the consortium may also be used for fine‐tuning (Pan et al., 2023 ). Since alternative carbon sources are generally interesting in order to prevent competition with human and animal nutrition or to decrease the cost of the process, a number of bacteria, including P. putida and C. glutamicum , have been engineered for the utilisation of non‐native carbon sources (Wendisch et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Providing an additional carbon source that is only accessible to one partner of the consortium may also be used for fine‐tuning (Pan et al., 2023 ). Since alternative carbon sources are generally interesting in order to prevent competition with human and animal nutrition or to decrease the cost of the process, a number of bacteria, including P. putida and C. glutamicum , have been engineered for the utilisation of non‐native carbon sources (Wendisch et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the design of these synthetic consortia, the interactions, mechanisms and structures of natural inter‐ and intrakingdom consortia need to be studied and understood (Zhang et al., 2018 ). Synthetic microbial consortia have several advantages over monocultures, for example due to the division of labour; reduction of metabolic loads; avoidance of the influence of different functions; optimal catalytic environments for enzymes derived from different sources; balance of cofactor and energy levels; higher adaptability and stability to environmental fluctuations (Harcombe et al., 2018 ; Pan et al., 2023 ; Shong et al., 2012 ). Most biotechnological processes are based on feedstocks, which are homogenous and continuously available, and thus, specialised monocultures can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Separating the steps of the pathway reduces the burden on each subpopulation, allowing for each subpopulation to commit more resources to its specific task. If the increase in productivity due to specialization and the additional accumulation of productive biomass outweighs the reduced metabolic efficiency due to the need for the transport of intermediates between subpopulations, then an SDOL system will outperform the analogous monoculture. , Indeed, studies have demonstrated SDOL as a viable approach for executing complex functions. However, stabilizing interstrain competition often requires the implementation of population ratio controllers to prevent the extinction of members of the consortium. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%