2020
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2020.3012488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Constant Dimension Codes From Two Parallel Versions of Linkage Construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, in Section 4 we consider constructions of CDCs based on rank metric codes. The results therein provide not only a generalization of several recent results [4,17,18,20,35,43], but they also offer a more general point of view with respect to techniques that have been previously investigated in the literature, as for instance the so called linkage construction [16,39]. In particular, by using rank metric codes in different variants, we are able to obtain CDCs that either give improved lower bounds for many parameters, including A 2 (12, 4; 4), A q (12, 6; 6), A q (4k, 2k; 2k), k ≥ 4 even, A q (10, 4; 5), or whose size matches the best known lower bounds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…More precisely, in Section 4 we consider constructions of CDCs based on rank metric codes. The results therein provide not only a generalization of several recent results [4,17,18,20,35,43], but they also offer a more general point of view with respect to techniques that have been previously investigated in the literature, as for instance the so called linkage construction [16,39]. In particular, by using rank metric codes in different variants, we are able to obtain CDCs that either give improved lower bounds for many parameters, including A 2 (12, 4; 4), A q (12, 6; 6), A q (4k, 2k; 2k), k ≥ 4 even, A q (10, 4; 5), or whose size matches the best known lower bounds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…More precisely, in Section 4 we consider constructions of CDCs based on rank metric codes. The results therein provide not only a generalization of several recent results [4,17,18,19,35,43], but they also offer a more general point of view with respect to techniques that have been previously investigated in the literature, as for instance the the so called linkage construction [16,39]. In particular, by using rank metric codes in different variants, we are able to obtain CDCs that either give improved lower bounds for many parameters, including A 2 (12, 4; 4), A q (12, 6; 6), A q (4k, 2k; 2k), k ≥ 4 even, A q (10, 4; 5), or whose size matches the best known lower bounds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%

Combining subspace codes

Cossidente,
Kurz,
Marino
et al. 2019
Preprint
“…Several of them started from Lemma 2.10 and improved Lemma 2.11 and Corollary 2.12, see e.g. [14,16,30,33,34]. We will briefly discuss this possibility in Subsection 3.3.…”
Section: Similar As For Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example we consider the parameters l = 2, n 1 = 5, n 2 = 5, a 1 = 2, a 2 = 3, b 1 = 1, and b 2 = 2, i.e., we are aiming at a lower bound for A q (10, 4; 5). Lemma 2.8 and Corollary 2.9 give a (10, , 4, 5) q CDC C with (14) #C = q 20 + [ 5 2 ] q • q 10 − q 7 − q 6 + q 2 + q − 1 + 1, i.e., #C = 1178312 for q = 2. For our specific choice n = (n 1 , n 2 ) = (5, 5), ā = (a 1 , a 2 ) = (2, 3), and b = (b 1 , b 2 ) = (1, 2) Corollary 2.12 gives a (10, , 4, 5) q CDC D such that C ∩ D = ∅ and d S (C ∪ D) ≥ 4, where #D ≥ q 9 , i.e., #D ≥ 512 for q = 2.…”
Section: Improved Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation