2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2009.01.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of differentiable transformations

Abstract: a b s t r a c tConstruction of invertible transformations using differential equations is an interesting and challenging mathematical problem with important applications. We briefly review the existing method by means of harmonic maps in 2D and propose a method of constructing differentiable, invertible transformations between domains in two and three dimensions. Preliminary numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A uniform Cartesian mesh on the background domain [1,9] by [1,12] is shown in Figure 1a below. The domain D is the interior of the contour described by points #1 to #18 on the curved boundary, and by the nodes (1,5), (1,6), (1,7), (1,8), (1,9), and (1, 10) on the vertical boundary, see Figure 1a. We select a set of 18 nodes on the Cartesian mesh that are close to the boundary of domain D, and move them to the points #1 through #18, respectively (see Appendix).…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A uniform Cartesian mesh on the background domain [1,9] by [1,12] is shown in Figure 1a below. The domain D is the interior of the contour described by points #1 to #18 on the curved boundary, and by the nodes (1,5), (1,6), (1,7), (1,8), (1,9), and (1, 10) on the vertical boundary, see Figure 1a. We select a set of 18 nodes on the Cartesian mesh that are close to the boundary of domain D, and move them to the points #1 through #18, respectively (see Appendix).…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the example, we take n = 10. The following equations are solved by the least squares finite element method (as described in [Cai et al 2004] [7] and [Liao et al 2009…”
Section: The Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A noteworthy subset of techniques for this purpose are known as the "variational methods" (see e.g. [8,1,6,3,9] and references therein), which aim to control characteristic quantities of grid transformations such as their divergence, curl, and Jacobian determinant. In essence, such variational methods are numerical techniques for minimizing nonlinear and often nonconvex functionals whose critical points represent mappings with desirable properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation method [4], [5], [7] has its origin in differential geometry [1]. Its main theoretical advantages is that the grid transformation generated has prescribed Jacobian determinant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a 1 , a 2 by(6), then solve Poisson's equation(7) to get g 1 , g 2 3. Update f by f i,new = f i,old − g i × tstep,where tstep is an optimization parameter 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%