Construction of Ecological Landscape Environment in Guanzhong Traditional Villages from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization

Abstract

In order to supplement and improve the landscape evaluation system of traditional villages and play a positive guiding role in the specific protection and development of village landscape, this paper proposes the ecological landscape environment evaluation of traditional villages in Guanzhong from the perspective of rural revitalization. First of all, the relevant national and provincial evaluation standards are deeply studied, and the comprehensive evaluation system of the traditional village landscape in the Guanzhong region is constructed by using expert scoring and an analytic hierarchy process, which includes 6 criteria and 25 indicators. Three typical villages of different types and different development stages, namely, village A, village B, and Village C, were selected for landscape investigation and comprehensive evaluation. The results show that the weight of village location and landscape pattern is the largest, that is, the most important. The second is architectural landscape, with a weight of 0.236, accounting for a high proportion. Then, it is the natural landscape and street landscape, with a weight of 0.1-0.2. Finally, it is the intangible cultural landscape and landscape style protection, with a weight of less than 0.1. The alpha value of the comprehensive evaluation questionnaire of the village A is 0.984. The alpha value of the comprehensive evaluation questionnaire of village B is 0.941. The alpha value of the comprehensive evaluation questionnaire for the landscape of village C is 0.986, which is greater than 0.8. Conclusion. This study makes a comprehensive evaluation of the landscape of typical traditional villages.

The Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms of Rural Revitalization in Western China

“…According to the research methodology, most of the papers were qualitative and used case studies. The studies on rural revitalization are in their infancy, and most of the papers try to summarize experiences, discover models, and develop technologies mainly by analyzing representative cases in old revolutionary areas [45], autonomous minority regions [46], historical and cultural villages and traditional villages [47], urban agglomerations and metropolitan areas [48], remote mountainous areas [49], povertystricken areas [50], and low-density population areas [51]. It is a remarkable fact that some scholars have already attempted the study of the theoretical construction of rural revitalization development based on case analysis and put forward three fundamental functions and four critical tasks of rural revitalization in China.…”

Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Traditional Villages in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

“…In recent years, the research content has mainly focused on the following aspects: (1) The cultural connotation and value evaluation of traditional villages [3,8]. Huang Zongsheng and others used the landscape aesthetic evaluation method to study the beauty of the traditional villages of the Dong nationality in southeastern Guizhou and summarized the aesthetic characteristics of the Dong villages into the ecological harmony of the natural environment of the village, the beauty of the spatial form, and the practical beauty of the function [9].…”