Exploiting Linked Data and Knowledge Graphs in Large Organisations 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45654-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Enterprise Knowledge Graphs (I)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current implementation of KGLiDS adopts the RDF model to manage the LiDS graph and uses Stardog as storage engine [11]. KGLiDS uses RDFbased knowledge graph technology because (i) it already includes the formalization of rules and metadata using a controlled vocabulary for the labels in the graphs ensuring interoperability [13,37], (ii) it has built-in notions of modularity in the form of named graphs, for instance, each pipeline is abstracted in its own named graph [10], and (iii) it is schema-agnostic, allowing the platform to support reasoning and semantic manipulation, e.g., adding new labeled edges between equivalent artifacts, as the platform evolves [9,14,39], and (iv) it has a powerful query language (SPARQL) to support federated query processing [4,27,35]. In extension, KGLiDS uses the RDF-star [17] model, which supports annotating edges between nodes with metadata, which enables us, for instance, to capture the similarity scores for similarity edges between column nodes of datasets.…”
Section: The Kglids Storage and Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current implementation of KGLiDS adopts the RDF model to manage the LiDS graph and uses Stardog as storage engine [11]. KGLiDS uses RDFbased knowledge graph technology because (i) it already includes the formalization of rules and metadata using a controlled vocabulary for the labels in the graphs ensuring interoperability [13,37], (ii) it has built-in notions of modularity in the form of named graphs, for instance, each pipeline is abstracted in its own named graph [10], and (iii) it is schema-agnostic, allowing the platform to support reasoning and semantic manipulation, e.g., adding new labeled edges between equivalent artifacts, as the platform evolves [9,14,39], and (iv) it has a powerful query language (SPARQL) to support federated query processing [4,27,35]. In extension, KGLiDS uses the RDF-star [17] model, which supports annotating edges between nodes with metadata, which enables us, for instance, to capture the similarity scores for similarity edges between column nodes of datasets.…”
Section: The Kglids Storage and Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Data Source of the EKG is usually centralized [32]. Some papers explain the implementation of Enterprise Knowledge Graphs [11,30,33]. Additionally, some tools allow to integrate database contents [1,31] or documents [9,14] into a Knowledge Graph or even directly from texts through Named Entity Resolution [12] and Thematic Scope Resolution [4,12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information representation in Linked Open Data format aids in the data's reuse and linkage with other KGs (Ehrlinger & Wöß, 2016;Villazon-Terrazas et al, 2021). For an individual in a disaster management situation it is also important to access geospatial data that contains information about the location that suffered the destruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our focus in this work is on representing information for disaster management and media planning, more specifically, information about: (a) Observations and Events (for example, information from photos, and information from text messages); (b) Spatial and Temporal data, such as coordinates or labels of locations and timestamps; and (c) Tasks and Plans for disaster management and media planning. Information representation in Linked Open Data format aids in the data’s reuse and linkage with other KGs (Ehrlinger & Wöß, 2016; Villazon-Terrazas et al ., 2021). For an individual in a disaster management situation it is also important to access geospatial data that contains information about the location that suffered the destruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%