1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80257-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Escherichia coli amber suppressor tRNA genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature-resistant revertant su+2UGA C39U70 suppresses at 30°C and 37°C (Table 1), whereas su+2UGA C39 suppresses at 42°C as well. As discussed below, the role of this mutation is to increase suppressor efficiency, consistent with previous results for mutations outside the anticodon (30,31). Mutations outside the anticodon of su+2 amber suppressor have also been found that probably increase suppressor efficiency (32,33) and are not mischarged by the DHFR assay (34).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The temperature-resistant revertant su+2UGA C39U70 suppresses at 30°C and 37°C (Table 1), whereas su+2UGA C39 suppresses at 42°C as well. As discussed below, the role of this mutation is to increase suppressor efficiency, consistent with previous results for mutations outside the anticodon (30,31). Mutations outside the anticodon of su+2 amber suppressor have also been found that probably increase suppressor efficiency (32,33) and are not mischarged by the DHFR assay (34).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…All but one of the substitutions made by the amber suppression method have a rate that is at least 25% of the control. These rates are about what is expected for Kdp, given that the efficiency of suppression ranges from about 10 to 70% (20). The relatively low rates of the Lys substitutions are consistent with the relatively low efficiency of this suppressor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Further experimentation led to the conclusion that the lack of strong suppressor activity was attributable to a defect in codon recognition or tRNA-ribosome interaction, rather than to a defect in aminoacylation [7]. Similar conclusions were reached during analysis of amber suppressor derivatives of tRNA ~u containing a C34/A36 double mutation [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The alternative explanation, that the U36 mutant is completely unrecognized by GluRS, is less appealing and is inconsistent with the observed (albeit low level) production of fl-galactosidase activity in CSH106. Previous studies with tRNAG~UA36(SuUAA/G) [8,9], tRNAG1uC34/A36(SuUAG) (amber suppressor) [7], and tRNAC~UG37 [20], demonstrated that at least some alterations in the anticodon permit recognition by GIuRS. Mischarging by LysRS is also unlikely since tRNA Glu contains several negative determinants for lysine identity [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation