2015
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2015.61013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of EST-SSR Databases for Effective Cultivar Identification and Their Applicability to Complement for Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Distinctness Test

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to construct a database of expressed sequence tag (EST)-simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to identify lettuce cultivars. A set of 370 EST-SSR primer pairs were applied for fingerprinting the lettuce cultivars. Fifty-eight EST-SSR markers showed hyper-variability and were able to differentiate 92 cultivars. A total of 176 polymorphic amplified fragments were obtained by the 58 markers, and two to eight SSR alleles were detected for each l˚Cus with an average of three alleles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple sequence repeats (SSRs; also called microsatellites) are useful genetic markers in many organisms. Due to their co-dominant and highly polymorphic nature, their even distribution throughout the genome, and their relative ease of development from enriched genomic libraries and expressed sequence tag (EST) collections (Collard and MacKill, 2008 ; Miah et al, 2013 ), SSRs are the marker of choice in linkage and genetic map construction (Varshney et al, 2009 ; Bindler et al, 2011 ; El-Rodeny et al, 2014 ), genetic diversity and population structure analysis (Barkley et al, 2006 ; Zhang et al, 2011 ; Chen et al, 2012 ; Xiao et al, 2012 ; Yoon et al, 2012 ), germplasm identification (Hong et al, 2015 ), and QTL mapping (Collard and MacKill, 2008 ; Varshney et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple sequence repeats (SSRs; also called microsatellites) are useful genetic markers in many organisms. Due to their co-dominant and highly polymorphic nature, their even distribution throughout the genome, and their relative ease of development from enriched genomic libraries and expressed sequence tag (EST) collections (Collard and MacKill, 2008 ; Miah et al, 2013 ), SSRs are the marker of choice in linkage and genetic map construction (Varshney et al, 2009 ; Bindler et al, 2011 ; El-Rodeny et al, 2014 ), genetic diversity and population structure analysis (Barkley et al, 2006 ; Zhang et al, 2011 ; Chen et al, 2012 ; Xiao et al, 2012 ; Yoon et al, 2012 ), germplasm identification (Hong et al, 2015 ), and QTL mapping (Collard and MacKill, 2008 ; Varshney et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In expressed plant sequences, the prevalence of these repetitions has been widely reported (Gupta et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2014;Hong et al, 2015;Boccacci et al, 2015). The regions of ESTs are transcriptional targets rich in dimers in the untranslated regions (UTR) and in the predominance of trimers in the open reading frame (ORF) (Ellegren, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For plant geneticists and breeders seeking to understand genomic architecture and devise crop improvement strategies, molecular detection and exploitation of genetic variation in crop genomes is one of the most important tasks. Various DNA marker technologies, such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and simple sequence repeats (SSRs), have been applied in recent decades to detect the genetic diversity of major crop plant species (Fernández, Figueiras, & Benito, ; Hong, Kwon, Mishra, & Kim, ; Mujaju, Sehic, & Nybom, ). Several polymorphic DNA markers have already been used to analyse cultivated non‐heading Chinese cabbage (Han et al, ; Song, Ge, Li, & Hou, ); however, the different datasets are not comparable because of the absence of a common core set of reference genotypes and the use of different marker systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%