2023
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202207955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Fluorinated Propane‐Trap in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Record Polymer‐Grade Propylene Production under High Humidity Conditions

Abstract: Propane/propene (C3H8/C3H6) separation is essential in the petrochemical industry but challenging because of their similar physical and chemical properties. Adsorptive separation with C3H8‐selective porous materials can energy‐efficiently produce high‐purity C3H6, which is highly promising for replacing conventional cryogenic distillation but suffers from unsatisfactory performance. Herein, through the precise incorporation of fluorinated functional groups into the confined pore space, a new fluorinated metal–… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then calculated the ideal adsorption solution theory (IAST) selectivity based on the C 3 H 8 and C 3 H 6 adsorption isotherms at 298 K. As shown in Figure d, the calculated IAST selectivity for an equimolar mixture of C 3 H 8 /C 3 H 6 can reach up to 2.7 at 298 K and 1 bar, which is consistent with our GCMC simulation, and the value is higher than the reported top-performing MOF adsorbents, such as PCP-IPA (2.48), FDMOF-2 (2.18), NUM-7 (1.7), and HIAM-402 (1.43) . Furthermore, Q st was calculated by fitting single-component gas adsorption isotherms at different temperatures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We then calculated the ideal adsorption solution theory (IAST) selectivity based on the C 3 H 8 and C 3 H 6 adsorption isotherms at 298 K. As shown in Figure d, the calculated IAST selectivity for an equimolar mixture of C 3 H 8 /C 3 H 6 can reach up to 2.7 at 298 K and 1 bar, which is consistent with our GCMC simulation, and the value is higher than the reported top-performing MOF adsorbents, such as PCP-IPA (2.48), FDMOF-2 (2.18), NUM-7 (1.7), and HIAM-402 (1.43) . Furthermore, Q st was calculated by fitting single-component gas adsorption isotherms at different temperatures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As shown in Figure 4f, the calculated IAST selectivities are both around 1.7 at very low pressure and steadily drop to 1.37 at 101 kPa, which is comparable to the reported top-performing materials (Figure S29). [46][47][48] We also calculated the IAST selectivity of equivalent C 3 H 8 /C 3 H 6 mixture for the different batch of Cu-ASY, which gives similar value of 1.44 at 101 kPa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 In the eld of gas separation, MOFs have exhibited superior performance, surpassing most other porous materials. For instance, numerous MOFs have been documented for their efficacy in purifying C 2 H 4 , 55-59 C 3 H 6 , [60][61][62][63][64] xylene, [65][66][67][68][69] as well as capturing carbon dioxide, [70][71][72][73][74] toxic Fig. 1 Timeline of typical MOF materials for the purification of C 2 H 4 and C 3 H 6 .…”
Section: Wenlei Yangmentioning
confidence: 99%