2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2022.128248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of genuinely entangled multipartite subspaces from bipartite ones by reducing the total number of separated parties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have checked numerically that is not true for the nUPBs from Proposition 4 with some chosen nodes for low dimensional small systems, but we have not been able to verify whether this holds in general for the given subspaces. A somewhat complementary question is whether our approach allows for a construction of fully nonpositive partial transpose (NPT) GESs, that is GESs that support only states being NPT across all bipartitions [9,23], and in case of a positive answer which dimensions of GESs could be achieved. This is especially intriguing in view of the recent construction of large fully NPT stabilizer GESs [21].…”
Section: Gme Mixed Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have checked numerically that is not true for the nUPBs from Proposition 4 with some chosen nodes for low dimensional small systems, but we have not been able to verify whether this holds in general for the given subspaces. A somewhat complementary question is whether our approach allows for a construction of fully nonpositive partial transpose (NPT) GESs, that is GESs that support only states being NPT across all bipartitions [9,23], and in case of a positive answer which dimensions of GESs could be achieved. This is especially intriguing in view of the recent construction of large fully NPT stabilizer GESs [21].…”
Section: Gme Mixed Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] was based on unextendible product bases (UPBs) [15,16] a natural notion for constructing entangled sub-Maciej Demianowicz: maciej.demianowicz@pg.edu.pl spaces -specifically, their nonorthogonal variant (nUPBs) [17]. Further developments made use of various tools and concepts: unextendible biproduct bases [9], certain characterization of bipartite completely entangled subspaces [18], stabilizer formalism [19,20,21], correspondence between quantum channels and subspaces of tensor product Hilbert spaces [22], or compositional (tensor product) approach [23]. While some of these proposal [18,22] offer the possibility of constructing GESs of any sizes, their actual general utility is only theoretical as they do not provide a recipe to achieve this task in any multipartite scenario and their applicability is in fact very limited and boils down to small systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After finding several examples of CES subspaces the interest in studying a special type of CES, that is genuinely entangled subspaces (GES) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] has gained some attention. These GESs contain only states which are genuinely entangled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, a method based on the correspondence between bipartite entangled subspaces and certain quantum channels has been presented in [20] to construct GESs subspaces. A more recent approach has been given in [21] in which a multipartite GESs can be constructed using an arbitrary collection of bipartite GESs by joining their adjacent subsystems under certain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%