2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of hydroxide pn junction for water splitting electrocatalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b Chronopotentiometry curves at the current density of 100 mA/cm 2 of the electrolytic cell with MoS 2 /NiFe LDH | MoNiFe coupled electrodes and the reference cell with Pt/C | RuO 2 coupled electrodes. c The comparison of overall water splitting performance at the current density of 100 mA/cm 2 for MoS 2 /NiFe LDH | MoNiFe and other noble-metal-free electrocatalysts in recently reported literature, such as MnCo-CH@NiFe-OH (1.69 V) 61 , NiFe-LDH/Ni(OH) 2 (1.81 V) 62 , NiCoFe-O@NF (1.7 V) 63 , NiP 2 /NiSe 2 (1.8 V) 64 , Ni2P-Fe2P/NF (1.68 V) 65 , NiFeP-CNT@NiCo/CP (1.92 V) 66 , FeCo/Co 2 P@NPCF (1.98 V) 67 , Co-NC/CP (1.86 V) 68 and CoP NFs (1.92 V) 69 . …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Chronopotentiometry curves at the current density of 100 mA/cm 2 of the electrolytic cell with MoS 2 /NiFe LDH | MoNiFe coupled electrodes and the reference cell with Pt/C | RuO 2 coupled electrodes. c The comparison of overall water splitting performance at the current density of 100 mA/cm 2 for MoS 2 /NiFe LDH | MoNiFe and other noble-metal-free electrocatalysts in recently reported literature, such as MnCo-CH@NiFe-OH (1.69 V) 61 , NiFe-LDH/Ni(OH) 2 (1.81 V) 62 , NiCoFe-O@NF (1.7 V) 63 , NiP 2 /NiSe 2 (1.8 V) 64 , Ni2P-Fe2P/NF (1.68 V) 65 , NiFeP-CNT@NiCo/CP (1.92 V) 66 , FeCo/Co 2 P@NPCF (1.98 V) 67 , Co-NC/CP (1.86 V) 68 and CoP NFs (1.92 V) 69 . …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b), implying a faster charge transport rate and hence improved electrocatalytic activity. [35][36][37] Additionally, the electrochemically active surface area of Nb 2 O 5Àx and Nb 2 O 5 was measured to further study the inuence of the OVs by calculating the electrochemical double-layer capacitance (C dl ). [37][38][39] The C dl of Nb 2 O 5Àx (3.1 mF cm À2 ) was larger than that of Nb 2 O 5 (2.4 mF cm À2 ), which proves that the introduction of OVs could provide more catalytically active sites for the ENRA reaction (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific surface area and porosity of the ZnP@Ni 2 P‐NiSe 2 were evaluated by nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms. As seen in Figure 2e, the ZnP@Ni 2 P‐NiSe 2 possesses a high specific surface area of 14.7 m 2 g –1 , ≈6.7 times higher than that of the pure ZnP NRs as well as many recently reported catalysts, such as Ni 0.7 Fe 0.3 S 2 , [ 35 ] Co‐Mo‐P@NCNS‐600, [ 36 ] MnCo‐CH@NiFe‐OH, [ 37 ] and β‐Ni(OH) 2 /NF. [ 38 ] In addition, the pore size distribution is observed at a range from 1 to 20 nm along with a high pore volume recorded at a narrow range of 1–3 nm, confirming the mesoporous nature of the catalyst (Inset in Figure 2e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%