2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-5050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of multi-homojunction TiO2 nanotubes for boosting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by steering photogenerated charge transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two reasons for the increase in the recombination of e − /h + pairs: (1) the high ion amount occupies the active sites of the photocatalyst, which can lead to a decrease in the surface area and, as a result, photocatalytic activity decreases 49 and (2) a large number of ion dopants are densely distributed on the TiO 2 surface, which can block the catalyst surface from receiving light irradiation, reducing the ability of TiO 2 to produce e − /h + pairs, thus decreasing the release of H 2 . 50,51 Huang and co-workers reported that the optimum doping amount of Nd 3+ was 0.1%, at which the average rate of H 2 evolution was 3.5 times that of undoped TiO 2 . 52 The release rate began to decrease with increasing doping concentration after peaking because Nd 3+ became the center of the e − /h + composite.…”
Section: Feature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two reasons for the increase in the recombination of e − /h + pairs: (1) the high ion amount occupies the active sites of the photocatalyst, which can lead to a decrease in the surface area and, as a result, photocatalytic activity decreases 49 and (2) a large number of ion dopants are densely distributed on the TiO 2 surface, which can block the catalyst surface from receiving light irradiation, reducing the ability of TiO 2 to produce e − /h + pairs, thus decreasing the release of H 2 . 50,51 Huang and co-workers reported that the optimum doping amount of Nd 3+ was 0.1%, at which the average rate of H 2 evolution was 3.5 times that of undoped TiO 2 . 52 The release rate began to decrease with increasing doping concentration after peaking because Nd 3+ became the center of the e − /h + composite.…”
Section: Feature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in H 2 -evolution rates between the TP and RT samples is significant, which further indicates that macromolecule OH – does not easily enter the inner surface of the catalyst to participate in the reaction. The ability of Pt to capture H + renders it a highly favorable site for the H 2 -evolution reaction, resulting in a disparity in activity between TP and TR samples …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of Pt to capture H + renders it a highly favorable site for the H 2 -evolution reaction, resulting in a disparity in activity between TP and TR samples. 44 Figure 6c depicts the stability of PTR after 20 h of exposure to UV−vis light irradiation in terms of the measured amount of evolved H 2 . The PTR sample showed a gradual decrease in H 2 evolution after four 5 h cycles.…”
Section: Structure and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that Ti 3+ has been formed, as reported in the literature. [38][39][40] EPR is usually used to investigate chemical species with unpaired electrons. From Fig.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Photocatalystmentioning
confidence: 99%