2018
DOI: 10.1137/17m1140595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Multibubble Solutions for the Critical GKDV Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recall that F(s, y) = λ 3 4 σ (s) and λ(s)y < − 1 4 σ (s) ⇒ y < −cs, and then using (2.2), (2.5) (with κ 0 = 1 2 ), we deduce that, for s large enough,…”
Section: Refined Profilementioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We recall that F(s, y) = λ 3 4 σ (s) and λ(s)y < − 1 4 σ (s) ⇒ y < −cs, and then using (2.2), (2.5) (with κ 0 = 1 2 ), we deduce that, for s large enough,…”
Section: Refined Profilementioning
confidence: 75%
“…(We also refer to [7] for the construction of exotic solutions in other contexts.) The article [5], where a class of flattening bubbles is constructed for the energy critical wave equation on R 3 , is particularly related to our work. More precisely, W being the unique radial positive solution of W + W 5 = 0 on R 3 , it is proved in [5] that for any |ν| 1, there exist global (for positive time) solutions of ∂ 2 t u = u + |u| 4 u such that u(t, x) ∼ t ν/2 W (t ν x) as t → +∞; the case 0 < ν 1 corresponds to blow-up in infinite time, while 0 < −ν 1 corresponds to flattening solitons.…”
Section: Motivation and Main Result We Consider The L 2 -Critical Gementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…See e.g. Lemma 2.7 in [4] for a detailled argument in the case of the (gKdV) equation, and Lemma 7 in the present paper for the corresponding estimates on the time derivatives of the parameters. For technical reasons, one can fix zero initial conditions on γ 1 , γ 2 as in (2.11), but the initial conditions on σ 1 , σ 2 , β 1 and β 2 have to depend on a parameter σ ∞ to be fixed later by a topological argument.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 85%