2009
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2009.05.070047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Near-Optimum Burst Erasure Correcting Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

Abstract: In this paper, a simple, general-purpose and effective tool for the design of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes for iterative correction of bursts of erasures is presented. The design method consists in starting from the parity-check matrix of an LDPC code and developing an optimized parity-check matrix, with the same performance on the memory-less erasure channel, and suitable also for the iterative correction of single bursts of erasures. The parity-check matrix optimization is performed by an algorithm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the minimum length of stopping sets determining the burst correcting capability depends on the column order of a parity check matrix. In order to enhance the burst erasure correctability, several heuristic algorithms to improve the column order have been prensend by Wadayama [9], Paolini and Chiani [15], Hosoya et al [8]. Of course, the column order of a parity check matrix does not affect the decoding performance over memoryless erasure channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the minimum length of stopping sets determining the burst correcting capability depends on the column order of a parity check matrix. In order to enhance the burst erasure correctability, several heuristic algorithms to improve the column order have been prensend by Wadayama [9], Paolini and Chiani [15], Hosoya et al [8]. Of course, the column order of a parity check matrix does not affect the decoding performance over memoryless erasure channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) using simple column swaps or variable-node permutations (swaps) to achieve or approach the concatenated channel capacity or threshold bounds. The enhanced codes are constructed from the following permutation methods: the greedy search and swap (GSS) algorithm [5], the pivot searching and swapping (PSS) method in [6], and the simulated annealing (SA) approach in [7]. We plot the codes performances on the concatenated channels with increasing q values.…”
Section: Ldpc Code Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metric here adopted to measure the code capability to exploit erasure correlation is the MTBL. An effective algorithm, proposed in [9], to improve the MTBL of a given LDPC code is reviewed next.…”
Section: B Geira Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%