2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of spherical harmonics and Clebsch–Gordan coefficients

Abstract: The SO(5) ⊃ SO(3) spherical harmonics form a natural basis for expansion of nuclear collective model angular wave functions. They underlie the recently-proposed algebraic method for diagonalization of the nuclear collective model Hamiltonian in an SU(1, 1) × SO(5) basis. We present a computer code for explicit construction of the SO(5) ⊃ SO(3) spherical harmonics and use them to compute the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients needed for collective model calculations in an SO(3)-coupled basis. With these Clebsch-Gordan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several advantages result from this choice of dynamical subgroup chain: (i) with the now available SO(5) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients [26,27], and explicit expressions for SO(5) reduced matrix elements, matrix elements of BM operators can be calculated analytically; (ii) by appropriate choices of SU(1,1) modified oscillator representations, the β basis wave functions range from those of the U(5) ⊃ SO(5) harmonic vibrational model to those of the rigid-beta wave function of the SO(5)-invariant Wilets-Jean model; and (iii) with these SU(1,1) representations, collective model calculations converge an order of magnitude more rapidly for deformed nuclei than in U(5) ⊃ SO(5) bases. Thus, the ACM combines the advantages of the BM and the IBM and makes collective model calculations a simple routine procedure [4,[28][29][30].…”
Section: Acm Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several advantages result from this choice of dynamical subgroup chain: (i) with the now available SO(5) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients [26,27], and explicit expressions for SO(5) reduced matrix elements, matrix elements of BM operators can be calculated analytically; (ii) by appropriate choices of SU(1,1) modified oscillator representations, the β basis wave functions range from those of the U(5) ⊃ SO(5) harmonic vibrational model to those of the rigid-beta wave function of the SO(5)-invariant Wilets-Jean model; and (iii) with these SU(1,1) representations, collective model calculations converge an order of magnitude more rapidly for deformed nuclei than in U(5) ⊃ SO(5) bases. Thus, the ACM combines the advantages of the BM and the IBM and makes collective model calculations a simple routine procedure [4,[28][29][30].…”
Section: Acm Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Maple [17] code presented here, the use of files of highly accurate precomputed SO(5) ⊃ SO(3) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients together with an exact analytic expression for the SO(5)-reduced matrix elements of SO(5) spherical harmonics enable these computationally intensive methods to be avoided entirely. These files of SO(5) ⊃ SO(3) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients were computed [18,19] using the algorithm developed in [20]. This algorithm, which also calculates SO(5) spherical harmonics, was based on the methods of [1] for calculating model SO (5) wave functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the relatively small differences between Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) can be attributed to SO (5) centrifugal coupling effects between the rotational and vibrational degrees of freedom that are included in Fig. 3(a) but not in 3(b).…”
Section: The Bohr Collective Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we can generate the complete set of SO(5) spherical harmonics and, from them, derive all required SO(5) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients [9,5]. We also obtain [5] the SO(5)-reduced matrix elements…”
Section: The Bohr Collective Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation