1973
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(73)90063-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of the Rudvalis group of order 145,926,144,000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we have 3 = 84, 4 = 24, 5 = 6 and 6 = 24/19 by Proposition 2.4, we see that the maximum coclique designs of are 2, 3, 4 or 5-designs. By computation with MAGMA, we verified that the maximum coclique designs of are 5-(24, 9,6) designs.…”
Section: The 2 11 : M 24 -Graph Codes and Hadamard Matricesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Since we have 3 = 84, 4 = 24, 5 = 6 and 6 = 24/19 by Proposition 2.4, we see that the maximum coclique designs of are 2, 3, 4 or 5-designs. By computation with MAGMA, we verified that the maximum coclique designs of are 5-(24, 9,6) designs.…”
Section: The 2 11 : M 24 -Graph Codes and Hadamard Matricesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It was originally constructed by J. H. Conway and D. B. Wales in its 28-dimensional projective representation by extending a representation of a maximal subgroup L 2 25 Á 2 2 (cf. [4,7]). A di¨erent construction of the same representation uses another maximal subgroup 2 6 Á G 2 2 (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The case A » Ru. Let Ru be the simple group of order 214 • 33 • 53 • 7 • 13-29 whose existence was first proposed by Rudvalis and later confirmed by Conway and Wales [7]. The multiplier of Ru is known to have order 2 and the outer automorphism group is trivial (see [11]).…”
Section: Assuming That Tf Normalizes Tx and Again Invoking Our Hypothmentioning
confidence: 99%