2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12617-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Xinjiang metabolic syndrome risk prediction model based on interpretable models

Abstract: Background We aimed to construct simple and practical metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk prediction models based on the data of inhabitants of Urumqi and to provide a methodological reference for the prevention and control of MetS. Methods This is a cross-sectional study conducted in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China. We collected data from inhabitants of Urumqi from 2018 to 2019, including demographic characteristics, anthropometric indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to the research findings of Solam Lee 40 and Junho Kim. 41 In contrast, Yan Zhang et al 24 identified walking and running as factors protective against MetS, but our model does not include these. We did filter out these factors in our LASSO regression analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is similar to the research findings of Solam Lee 40 and Junho Kim. 41 In contrast, Yan Zhang et al 24 identified walking and running as factors protective against MetS, but our model does not include these. We did filter out these factors in our LASSO regression analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Previous studies often employed univariate analysis to validate multivariate analysis results or used stepwise regression and logistic regression analyses to identify predictor variables in the model. For example, Yan Zhang etal 24 used a multivariate logistic regression analysis and decision tree to establish MetS risk prediction models, their data set was preprocessed with a multiple imputation method, and between-group comparisons and multivariate analyses were then performed to determine the independent variables, their results showed that high SBP, high DBP, fatty liver, high BMI, smoking status, previous diabetes, previous hypertension, and age were risk factors. In another study, a risk prediction model of MetS for oil workers was reported; although the authors established three models, their method for building these models and screening independent variables was to first conduct a single factor analysis and then a multivariate logistics regression analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that all three models demonstrate commendable assessment performance. However, in practical implementations, it is imperative to consider both the interpretability and performance of the risk assessment model [ 48 ]. The logistic regression model, as a conventional modeling procedure, not only allows for the screening of potential influential factors of a disease but also provides a quantitative interpretation of the impact of each variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the RFE-KNN model combined with RFE and the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier has the best performance. Zhang et al (2022) , based on the physical examination data of a health examination institution in Urumqi in 2018, used three feature selection methods, RFE, measured resting metabolic rate (MRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), combined with two model explanatory methods of variable importance and linear interpolation with maximum entropy (LIME), to process the metabolic syndrome risk prediction model before and after modeling. Li & Liu (2020) used the gene epitope data of spontaneous premature birth (SPB) as a basis, used SVM-RFE for gene feature selection, and compared it with other machine learning and feature selection methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%