2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction on teaching quality evaluation indicator system of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) clinical nursing practice in China: A Delphi study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding weight analysis, previous studies have primarily relied on experts' opinions (subjective weights), utilizing the AHP method 47 , 48 . However, this study employed real-world data directly captured from the hospital information system to derive objective weights through the entropy weight method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding weight analysis, previous studies have primarily relied on experts' opinions (subjective weights), utilizing the AHP method 47 , 48 . However, this study employed real-world data directly captured from the hospital information system to derive objective weights through the entropy weight method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, MHELM intervention was delivered by MDT from expertise of gynecologic endocrinology, sports medicine, music therapy, psychology, nutrition, pharmacy, osteoporosis. The core concept of MDT was patient-centered, individualized and continuously comprehensive treatment schemes for specific diseases based on the multidisciplinary team, which has been widely used over the world in recent years ( 42 ). Meanwhile, we innovatively combined music therapy in MHELM, which can relieve depression and menopausal symptoms to a large extent ( 43 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rst draft of the expert consultation questionnaire consists of three parts, the rst part is the general information about the experts: age, years of experience, education, title, etc. ; the second part is the self-assessment tool for self-assessment of the readiness of the pharmacy department of the health care institution to teach internships Indicator Importance Evaluation Scale, which evaluates the importance of the indicators using a Likert ve-point scale, with 5=very important, 4=important, 3=generally important, 2=unimportant, and 1=not important at all, and provide a suggestion column; Part III Indicator Judgment Basis Table : expert scores for familiarity with survey content and indicator judgment [21] .…”
Section: The Delphi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%